Allele Specific Polymerase Chain Reaction (AS-PCR) Assay to Detect Knockdown and Acetylcholinesterase Mutations in <i>Anopheles superpictus</i>
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
Original Investigation
P: 307-311
December 2022

Allele Specific Polymerase Chain Reaction (AS-PCR) Assay to Detect Knockdown and Acetylcholinesterase Mutations in Anopheles superpictus

Turkiye Parazitol Derg 2022;46(4):307-311
1. Aydın Adnan Menderes University Faculty of Science, Department of Biology, Aydın, Turkey
No information available.
No information available
Received Date: 04.01.2022
Accepted Date: 26.09.2022
Publish Date: 28.11.2022
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

ABSTRACT

Objective:

The study aims to determine the presence of L1014F, L1014S, L1014C alleles, which are responsible for knockdown resistance and Ace-1 G119S alleles, which are responsible for acetylcholinesterase insensitivity in Anopheles superpictus, the secondary vector of malaria in Turkey.

Methods:

In this study, 60 Anopheles superpictus adult females were collected from Aydın, Denizli, and Muğla provinces. Then, allele-specific primers for kdr L1014F, L1014S, and L1014C alleles, and the Ace-1 G119S allele were designed. The presence of these alleles was screened in three Anopheles superpictus populations by allele-specific polymerase chain reaction.

Results:

Although L1014S allele frequency was too low in Aydın, Muğla, and Denizli populations, neither kdr L1014F and L1014C nor Ace-1 G119S mutations were found in any population.

Conclusion:

In this study, kdr L1014S mutation was detected for the first time in the Aegean Anopheles superpictus populations.

Keywords: Anopheles superpictus, knockdown, acetylcholinesterase, allele-specific primer

INTRODUCTION

Mosquitoes impact on over half of the worlds’ population through the transmission of harmful diseases such as malaria, dengue, encephalitis and filariasis (1). Of these, Anopheles mosquitoes are responsible for the transmission of malaria all over the world. A total of 241 million malaria cases were reported globally and 627,000 people died due to malaria in 2020 (2).

Turkey had a devastating malaria history between the beginning of the First World War (1914-1918) and WHO’s Global Malaria Eradication Programme established in 1957 in Turkey (3). Success was maintained until about 1978s and then case numbers increased in the following years (4). Although large-scale malaria control operations were reintroduced after 1978, case numbers increased dramatically as a result of intensive DDT use and insecticide resistance in mosquito populations (5). In the following years, malaria transmission increased rapidly in the mid-1990s (6). A significant decrease in malaria cases have been succeeded in Turkey after Tashkent declaration in 2005. Finally, significant progress has been performed toward national malaria elimination by the effort of the Turkish Ministry of Health (7).

The primary vector of malaria in Turkey is Anopheles sacharovi while Anopheles superpictus, Anopheles maculipennis and Anopheles subalpinus are known as secondary malaria vectors (5). However, due to exophilic and zoophilic tendencies, the epidemiological role of An. superpictus in malaria transmission varies (8).

Pyrethroids (PYs) are synthetic insecticides with high activity. They act on the voltage sensitive sodium channel (VSSC) (9). When PYs are attached to VSSC, they disrupt the opening and closing kinetics of VSSC. The poisoned insect loses control of its nervous system and shows trembling behaviour which is known as the knockdown effect (10). PYs have been widely used as an effective adult and larval mosquito control (11). However, extensive PYs use has led strong selection pressure and resulted in resistance problems in different mosquito populations all around the world. Knockdown resistance (kdr) mutations, a target site mutation, occurs in the vssc gene and cause reduced susceptibilty to PYs (12). So far, various kdr mutations have been reported from different Anopheles species as well as other mosquitoes (13). Molecular assays are useful tools in order to monitor the allele frequencies of target site mutations. Of these, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) based approaches are low-cost and practical ways to detect resistance alleles in mosquito populations (14).

Another target site mutation is known as Ace-1 (G199S) mutation developed against organophosphates and carbamates. G119S mutation causes the conversion of the aminoacid glycine, which encodes the active site of the enzyme, to serine and causes acetylcholinesterase insensitivity (12). To date, the G119S mutation has been reported from different Anopheles species including Anopheles albimanus and Anopheles gambiae (15).

This study aims to design reliable allele-specific primers (ASP) to use in allele-specific PCR (AS-PCR) to detect kdr L1014F, L1014S, L1014C and Ace-1 G119S alleles in An. superpictus populations. Designed ASP were applied in AS-PCR to analyse kdr and Ace-1 mutation frequencies in An. superpictus populations collected from Aydın, Muğla and Denizli provinces of Turkey. This is the first study to determine kdr and Ace-1 mutation frequencies in Turkish An. superpictus populations.

METHODS

Allele Specific Primer Design

The ASP for detection of the wild type (Leucin-1014L) or mutated (Phenylalanine-1014F; Cystein-1014C; Serine 1014S) kdr allele in position 1014 of the vssc gene was designed through Primer3plus software (16). A 243 base pair (bp) long partial vssc gene sequence of An. superpictus, uploaded to GenBank by Djadid et al. (17), was obtained from GeneBank (Accession number: AH014535.2). Species specific forward (SupkdrF-5’- GGATTGAATCAATGTGGGATTGT-3’) and reverse (SupkdrR-5’-AAGGATGAAGAACCGAAATTGGAC) primers were designed based on the partial sequence of vssc gene of An. superpictus obtained from GeneBank. Similarly, a 24 bp long each allele specific primers for leucine (SupkdrL1-5’- GCTACAGTAGTGATAGGAAATTTA-3’, phenylalanine (SupkdrF-5’- GCTACAGTAGTGATAGGAAATTTT-3’, cysteine (SupkdrC-5’- GCTACAGTAGTGATAGGAAATTGT-3’ and serine (SupkdrSer-5’- GCTACAGTAGTGATAGGAAATTCA-3’ alleles were designed through Primer3Plus software.

Primers Ex3AgF:5’- GATCGTGGACACCGTGTTCG-3¢ and Ex3AgR:5’-AGGATGGCCCGCTGGAACAG-3¢ were used to amplify approximately 500 bp partial sequence of Ace-1 gene (18). Similarly, AS (SupAceS-5’- GCTACAGTAGTGATAGGAAATTTA-3’ and (SupAceR-5’- GCTACAGTAGTGATAGGAAATTCA-3’ primers were designed to amplify approximately 400 bp glycine and serine alleles at positions 119 of the Ace-1 gene.

Sample Collection and Study Area

Adult specimen collection was performed in 3 different locations from Aydın, Muğla and Denizli provinces of the Aegean region of Turkey. Sampling was performed between May-September 2018. Adult females were captured from the resting sites through aspirator. Collected samples were transferred in cages to vector insect laboratory of Aydın Adnan Menderes University. Morphological identifications have been performed through an identification key guided by Becker et al. (11). Adult mosquitoes were stored in a -20 °C until genomic DNA have been isolated. A total of 60 genomic DNA was extraction was performed from whole body of individual female mosquitoes using Invitrogen genomic DNA extraction kit (TermoFisher Scientific, USA). The PCR assay was applied to genotype a total of 60 An. superpictus specimens collected from 3 sites from Aydın, Muğla and Denizli.

Detection of Alleles Using AS-PCR

Each AS-PCR for detection of kdr alleles was performed in a final 25 µL volume. The reaction consisted of: 1× PCR Buffer, 1.5 U DNA polymerase, 2.5 mM dNTP, 10 µM each of primers and 1.5 µL of DNA (~20-50 ng). Reaction conditions were consisted of first denaturation at 95 °C, 5 min; 40 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C, 30 s; annealing at 59 °C, 1 min; extension at 72 °C, 1 min and the finally 72 °C, 5 min. PCR products were run on 2% agarose gel for 75 min at 70 V in 1× tris borate ethylenediamine tetra acetic acid buffer and visualised under UV light. Approximately ~250 bp long fragment for control band and ~190 bp fragment for each allele was visualized if the sample had that allele (Figure 1).

Figure 1

Ace-1 alleles were detected by AS-PCR which was carried out in a final volume of 25 µL containing 1.5 µL 2.5 mM dNTP, 2 µL buffer, 0.2 µL 10 mM from each primer, 0.25 µL (5 U/mL) Taq DNA polymerase and 1 µL DNA. Thermal cycle programme was consisted of a first denaturation at 95 °C, 10 min; 30 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C, 30 s; annealing 56 °C, 30 s; extension 72 °C, 30 s and finally 72 °C, 10 min. PCR products were run on 1% agarose gel and visualized under ultraviole light (Figure 2).

Figure 2

In order to validate the efficacy and reliability of AS-PCR, obtained PCR products were sequenced through a 3730xl capillary system automatic sequencer. Resistant (Serine-1014S) and sensitive alleles (Leucine-1014L) were deposited in GenBank (accession numbers: OP503892-OP503893) (Figure 3).

Figure 3

Statistical Analysis

Genotyping and kdr allele frequencies and Hardy-Weinberg expectations of each An. superpictus populations have been tested via exact probability test via POPGENE (19).

RESULTS

Although all L1014F, L1014C and L1014S alleles were screened in An. superpictus populations, only L1014S allele was found in the study area. L allele frequency was 0.8750 in the Aydın and Muğla population while S allele frequency was 0.1250 in these populations. In total, 80% and 85% of the individuals had homozygous L1014L in Aydın and Muğla populations while 15% of the populations had heterozygous L1014L/L1014S in the populations, respectively. L allele frequency was 0.9750 in the Denizli population while S alle frequency was 0.0250. Only 5% of the population had heterozygous L1014L/L1014S while 95% of them had homozygous L1014L. All of the populations were in the Hardy Weinberg Equilibrium (p>0.05) calculated based on Fisher’s Exact test. The kdr genotype, leucine and serine allele frequencies and exact test results of each An. superpictus population are given in Table 1.

Table 1

No Ace-1 (serine) mutation was found either in any of the An. superpictus populations. All specimen had wild type Ace-1 (Glycine) allele encoded by GGG (Figure 2).

DISCUSSION

A key finding of this research is the identification of the L1014S allele in An. superpictus populations collected from Aydın, Muğla and Denizli. This result is a proof of the presence of this allele in An. superpictus populations from western Turkey. Since sample size of collected specimen is not wide enough, further studies with larger specimen numbers are needed to understand the exact frequency of resistance alleles in An. superpictus populations. The presence of the L1014S alleles was first described in Anopheles sacharovi (20). It was also reported in An. sacharovi populations collected from the Mediterranean and Aegean populations in Turkey (21). This is the first record of presence of the kdr alleles in An. superpictus. However, several kdr alleles (L1014F, L1014C, L1014W) have been detected in different mosquito populations all over the World. For instance, L1014S alleles have been reported in Anopheles gambiae populations in several countries including Burkina Faso (22) and Cameroon (23). The presence of this allele was reported in Anopheles arabiensis populations collected from Uganda (24) and Ethiopia (25). All L1014F, L10104F, L1014C and L1014W mutations have been reported in Chinese Anopheles sinensis populations (26).

Another important finding of the study is the lack of Ace-1 mutation (G119S) in An. superpictus populations collected from the study area. The serine allele was not found in any of the samples while ASP created a band profile on agarose gel with only the GGG-encoded glycine allele. Similarly, G119S alleles have not been detected in Turkish An. sacharovi (20) and Iranian An. stephensi populations (27). However, several researchers reported the presence of G119S alleles in different An. gambiae populations in Mali (28), Nigeria (29) and An. arabiensis populations in Senegal (30).

Although this study provides useful evidence for the presence of L1014S allele in An. superpictus populations in the Aegean region of Turkey, it does not allow to evaluate the frequency of the alleles and meaningful population genetic analysis due to limited sample size. Further investigation with larger specimen numbers is required to determine the geographical distribution of this allele in this geographic area. The other limitation of the study is the lack of bioassay tests to test insecticide susceptibility status of the species. Further studies should aim to detect mortality rates against different kind of insecticide with recommended insecticide dose through the susceptibility tests of World Health Organisation. It should be taken into consider that molecular analysis should be supported with bioassays to understand resistance levels and underlying mechanisms.

CONCLUSION

This study proposed a useful and practical allele specific primer to genotype L1014F, L1014C, L1014S kdr mutation in An. superpictus, a secondary malaria vector species in Turkey. The use of AS-PCR to monitor kdr mutation in An. superpictus populations might facilitate the detection of the mutation when it is in initial stage before the resistance alleles spread wider. Additionally, results also proved that Ace-1 G119S mutation associated with acetylcholinesterase insensitivity is not detected in western Turkish An. superpictus populations. Regular detection of allele frequencies in vector mosquito species is of great importance to manage insecticide resistance policies at the local levels. This study is a preliminary study that proposes AS primer sequences rather than giving clear information about the kdr allele frequencies in Aegean region populations. Clear information about the kdr allele frequencies of the populations and the resistance status might be gathered by increasing the specimen numbers in future studies.

*Ethics

Ethics Committee Approval: This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed Consent: This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Peer-review: Externally peer-reviewed.

* Authorship Contributions

Concept: S.İ.Y., F.M.Ş., Design: S.İ.Y., F.M.Ş., Data Collection or Processing: S.İ.Y., Analysis or Interpretation: S.İ.Y., Literature Search: S.İ.Y., Writing: S.İ.Y., F.M.Ş.

Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest was declared by the authors.

Financial Disclosure: This research was funded by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK, project no: 112T479).

References

1
Gubler DJ. Resurgent vector-borne diseases as a global health problem. Emerg Infect Dis 1998; 4: 442-50.
2
World Health Organisation. World Malaria Report 2020. Geneva; 2020.
3
World Health Organisation. Eliminating malaria. The long road to malaria elimination in Turkey. Geneva; 2013.
4
Piyal B, Akdur R, Ocaktan E, Yozgatligil C. An analysis of the prevalence of malaria in Turkey over the last 85 years. Pathog Glob Health 2013; 107: 30-4.
5
Özbilgin A, Topluoglu S, Islek E, Mollahaliloglu E, Erkoc Y. Malaria in Turkey: Successful control and strategies for achieving elimination. Acta Trop 2011; 120: 15-23.
6
Topluoglu S, Karasartova D, Karaer ZK, Taylan Ozkan A. Şanlıurfa yöresindeki Anofel larvalarının morfolojik tanımlanması ve üreme alanlarının fiziksel ve ekolojik özelliklerinin araştırılması. Turk Hij Den Biyol Derg 2020; 77: 207-16.
7
World Health Organisation. World Malaria Report 2019. Geneva; 2019.
8
Alten B, Çaglar SS, Ozer N. Malaria and its vectors in Turkey. European Mosquito Bulletin 2000; 7: 27-33.
9
Brengues C, Hawkes NJ, Chandre F, McCarroll L, Dunchon S, Guillet P, et al. Pyrethroid and DDT cross-resistance in Aedes aegypti is correlated with novel mutations in the voltage gated sodium channel gene. Med Vet Entomol 2003; 17: 87-94.
10
Liu N, Xu Q, Zhu F, Zhang L. Pyrethroid resistance in mosquitoes. Insect Science 2006; 13: 159-66.
11
Becker N, Petric D, Zgomba M, Boase C, Dahl C, Lane J, et al. Mosquitoes and Their Control. Kluwer Academic, Plenum publishers, USA, 2003.
12
Hemingway J, Hawkes NJ, Mc Carroll L, Ranson H. The molecular basis of insecticide resistance in mosquitoes. Insect Biochem Mol Biol 2004; 34: 653-65.
13
Tancredi A, Papandrea D, Marconcini M, Carballar-Lejarazu R, Casas-Martinez M, Lo E, et al. Tracing temporal and geographic distribution of resistance to pyrethroids in the arboviral vector Aedes albopictus. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2020; 14: e0008350.
14
Pichler V, Mancini E, Micocci M, Calzetta M, Arnoldi D, Rizzoli A, et al. Novel Allele Specific Polymerase Chain Reaction (AS-PCR) Assay to Detect the V1016G Knockdown Resistance Mutation Confirms Its Widespread Presence in Aedes albopictus Populations from Italy. Insects 2021; 12: 79.
15
Weill M, Malcolm C, Chandre F, Mogensen K, Bertomieu A, Marquine M, Raymond M. The unique mutation in ace-1 giving high insecticide resistance is easily detectable in mosquito vectors. Insect Mol Biol 2004; 13: 1-17.
16
Untergasser A, Nijveen H, Rao X, Bisseling T, Geurts R, Leunissen JAM. Primer3Plus, an enhanced web interface to Primer3. Nucleic Acids Res 2007; 35: W71-4.
17
Djadid ND, Jazayeri H, Gholizadeh S, Rad S, Zakeri S. First record of a new member of Anopheles hyrcanus Group from Iran: molecular identification, diagnosis, phylogeny, status of kdr resistance and Plasmodium infection. J Med Entomol 2009; 46: 1084-93.
18
Dabiré RK, Namountougou M, Diabaté A, Soma DD, Bado J, Toé HK, et al. Distribution and frequency of kdr mutations within Anopheles gambiae populations and first report of the Ace-1 G119S mutation in Anopheles arabiensis from Burkina Faso (West Africa). PLoS One 2014; 9: e101484.
19
Yeh FC, Yang RC, Boyle T. 1999. Popgene Version 1.32: Microsoft Window-Based Freeware for Population Genetics Analysis. University of Alberta, Edmonton.
20
Lüleyap Ü, Alptekin D, Kasap H, Kasap M. Detection of knockdown resistance mutations in Anopheles sacharovi (Diptera: Culicidae) and genetic distance with Anopheles gambiae (Diptera: Culicidae) using cDNA sequencing of the voltage-gated sodium channel gene. J Med Entomol 2002; 39: 870-4.
21
Yavaşoğlu SI, Ulger C, Şimşek FM. The first implementation of allele-specific primers for detecting the knockdown and acetylcholinesterase target site mutations in malaria vector, Anopheles sacharovi. Pestic Biochem Physiol 2021; 171: 104746.
22
Namountougou M, Diabate A, Etang J. First report of the L1014S kdr mutation in wild populations of Anopheles gambiae M and S molecular forms in Burkina Faso (West Africa). Acta Trop 2012; 125: 123-7.
23
Etang J, Fondjo E, Chandre F, Morlais I, Brengue C, Nwane P et al. First report of knockdown mutations in the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae from Cameroon. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2006; 74: 795-7.
24
Verhaeghen K, Van Bortel, W, Roelants P, Backeljau T, Coosemans, M. Detection of the East and West African kdr mutation in Anopheles gambiae and Anopheles arabiensis from Uganda using a new assay based on FRET/melt curve analysis. Malar J 2006; 5: 16.
25
Yewhalaw D, Bortel WV, Denis L, Coosemans M, Duchateau L, Speybroeck N. First evidence of high knockdown resistance frequency in Anopheles arabiensis (Diptera: Culicidae) from Ethiopia. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2010; 83: 122-5.
26
Tan WL, Wang MD, Liu YD, Dong XY, Feng ZM, Wu XX, et al. First detection of multiple knockdown resistance (kdr)-like mutations in voltage-gated sodium channel using three new genotyping methods in Anopheles sinensis from Guangxi Province, China. J Med Entomol 2012; 49: 1012-20.
27
Soltani A, Vatandoost H, Oshaghi MA, Ravasan NM, Enayati AA, Asgarian, F. Resistance Mechanisms of Anopheles stephensi (Diptera: Culicidae) to Temephos. J Arthropod Borne Dis 2014; 9: 71-83.
28
Keïta M, Kané F, Thiero O, Traoré B, Zeukeng F, Sodio AB, et al. Acetylcholinesterase (ace-1R) target site mutation G119S and resistance to carbamates in Anopheles gambiae (sensu lato) populations from Mali. Parasit Vectors 2020; 13: 283.
29
Fagbohun IK, Idowu ET, Otubanjo OA, Awolola TS. First report of AChE1 (G119S) mutation and multiple resistance mechanisms in Anopheles gambiae s.s. in Nigeria. Scientific Reports 2020; 10: 7482.
30
Sy O, Sarr PC, Assogba BS, Ndiaye M, Dia AK, Ndiaye A, et al. Detection of kdr and ace-1 mutations in wild populations of Anopheles arabiensis and An. melas in a residual malaria transmission area of Senegal, Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology 2021; 173: 104783.
2024 ©️ Galenos Publishing House