Presence of <i>Neospora caninum</i> DNA of Wild Birds from Turkey
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
Original Investigation
P: 231-236
December 2021

Presence of Neospora caninum DNA of Wild Birds from Turkey

Turkiye Parazitol Derg 2021;45(4):231-236
1. Ege University, Ödemiş, Vocational School, İzmir, Turkey
2. Ege University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Parasitology, İzmir, Turkey
3. Ege University, Faculty of Science, Department of Biology, Section of Molecular Biology, İzmir, Turkey
4. İzmir Natural Life Park Branch Directorate, Municipality of İzmir, İzmir, Turkey
5. The Protection and Development Union of İzmir Bird Paradise, İzmir, Turkey
6. Munzur University, Institute of Science, Tunceli, Turkey
7. Namık Kemal University, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Parasitology, Tekirdağ, Turkey
No information available.
No information available
Received Date: 13.04.2021
Accepted Date: 15.04.2021
Publish Date: 02.12.2021
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

ABSTRACT

Objective:

Neospora caninum is a protozoon parasite that has a worldwide distribution and mainly causes abortion in cattle and current serological evidence shows that the disease may be also zoonotic. Wild birds play a role as a reservoir of the disease in nature. The study aimed to determine the prensence of N. caninum in wild birds.

Methods:

In this study, the presence of neosporosis in wild birds (n=55) including 22 different species found in the western side of Turkey, was investigated by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). In addition, PCR positive samples were confirmed by sequencing, BLAST, and phylogenetic analysis using MEGA7.

Results:

Obtained results showed that the presence of N. caninum DNA was 5.45% (3/55) in brain-heart homogenates wild birds. The bird species which were found positive for N. caninum were little owl (Athene noctua), common buzzard (Buteo buteo), and little tern (Sternula albifrons). According to phylogenetic analysis and BLAST, all samples were compatible with reference N. caninum isolates.

Conclusion:

To the best of authors’ knowledge, this is the first study detecting N. caninum in little tern. In future studies, it may be interesting to investigate the prevalence of N. caninum in other wild animals to elucidate the transmission properties.

Keywords: Little tern, Neospora caninum, PCR, Turkey, wild birds

INTRODUCTION

Neospora caninum (N. caninum) is a protozoon parasite that can cause neurological disorders, paralysis, and skeletal muscle problems in dogs. Cattle are by far the most affected species by this parasite because of abortions (1-3).

Up to date, viable parasites have been isolated only from dogs, gray wolves, cattle, sheep, water buffalo, europian bison, and white-tailed deer. However, many studies using molecular techniques showed that N. caninum can be detected in other mammals and birds (4-11). In humans, although antibodies against this parasite have been described, the zoonotic potential is unclear because neither parasite nor its DNA has not been detected in human tissues (4,12).

N. caninum was first described by Bjerkas and Presthus (13) from dogs in Norway in 1988 and later in a wide range of other animals (14). In wild bird species, N. caninum infection is transmitted by hunting and eating small animals containing tissue cyst or their carcasses, as well as through consuming food and water contaminated by oocyst. Thus, predator birds are more frequently infected by N. caninum. Different researches have highlighted the role of birds in the transmission of N. caninum (1,15,16). In experimental animal models using chickens, partridges, and quails, N. caninum caused death in all of the partridges and neurological disorders as well as dose-dependent variable mortality rates in chickens and quails (17-19).

Wild birds require different areas for hunting, feeding, and breeding and these properties are very important for the transmission of N. caninum in nature (20-22). Turkey has important geographical locations on the migration routes of wild birds and also hosts them. İzmir and Manisa provinces are located in the western side of Turkey next to the migration routes of wild birds. Moreover, İzmir is the third biggest city in Turkey and has a huge wildlife park and bird sanctuary. The present study aimed to investigate the presence of N. caninum DNA in deceased wild birds found in the western part of Turkey by polymerase chain reaction (PCR).

METHODS

Characteristics of the Study Area

İzmir and Manisa provinces (latitude: 37-38 °N, longitude: 26-29 °E) which have a mild Mediterranean climate and are located on the western part of Turkey which have a neighborhood to the Gediz Delta Plain. İzmir Bird Paradise sheltering 289 species of birds has a size of 8.000 hectares. Overall, 50 thousand birds come to this region during migrating. In addition, İzmir bird paradise is the popular resting and hunting area of wild birds coming to Gediz Delta Plain.

Birds and Sample Collection

Dead wild birds were found in the İzmir Bird Paradise or brought to İzmir Natural Life Park Clinics from eight different districts of İzmir province (Bornova, Konak, Bergama, Kemalpaşa, Balçova, Karabağlar and Seferihisar) and four districts from Manisa province (Saruhanlı, Turgutlu, Salihli and Centrum) between 2015 and 2017. İzmir Bird Paradise and İzmir Natural Life Park are located in Çiğli district next to Gediz Delta Plain. Organs (brain and hearth) were collected from 55 dead birds. The species of wild birds are listed in Table 1.

Table 1

Organ Homogenization and DNA Extraction

The organs homogenates were prepared both the brain and heart of wild birds as previously described (23-25). Firstly, the brain and heart of the dead birds were weighed together. 125 mL (125 mL NaCl/10 gr organs) 0.9% NaCl was added and homogenized using a blender (Waring, USA). Thereafter, trypsin was added to the homogenate (0.5 gr trypsin/10 gr organs) and incubated with 120 rpm at 37 °C for 60 min in an incubator shaker (New Brunswick, USA). After incubation, the homogenate was filtered through sterile two-layered gauzes and centrifuged at 910×g. Next, the supernatant was discarded and the pellet was washed two times with 0.9% NaCl. After the last centrifugation, the pellet was homogenized with 5 mL 0.9% NaCl and, 500 µL aliquot was kept for DNA extraction. DNA isolation from bird organ samples was performed using QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (Qiagen, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol.

Molecular Detection

PCR targeting a ~340 bp product of the N. caninum Nc5 gene was performed as described using the Np6 (Forward primer, 5’-CTCGCCAGTCAACCTACGTCTTCT-3’) and Np21 (Reverse primer, 5’-CCCAGTGCGTCCAATCCTGTAAC-3’) primers (1,26). The 20 µL amplification reactions included 2 µL template DNA, the primers (0.5 µM each), 1.25 U Taq DNA Polymerase (Thermo Scientific, USA), 200 µM dNTPs, 3.25 mM MgCl2 and 1xTaq reaction buffer. The PCR amplification reaction was performed using the following protocol: 10 min initial denaturation step at 95 oC, followed by 40 cycles of 60 s at 95 oC, 60 s at 56 oC, and 60 s at 72 oC, and a final extension of 10 min at 72 oC. All PCR products were separated by 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis, stained by ethidium bromide and, visualized under DNR bio-imaging systems (Israel). A DNA sample confirmed to be belonging to N. caninum was used as the positive control (1) and, distilled water was used as the negative control.

Sequencing

PCR products of 340 bp fragments belonging to positive samples were sequenced by ABI3730XL. Generated sequences were edited and aligned by MEGA 7.0 software. Also, BLAST analysis was performed to compare with reference N. caninum samples in National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI).

The phylogenetic analysis was performed by MEGA 7.0 software. The phylogenetic tree based on Nc5 gene sequences belonging to Neospora isolates was constructed by MEGA7.0 software according to the Neighbour Joining/Maximum Likelihood method using Kimura 2 Gamma distribution (K2+G) model with 500 Bootstrap replications.

RESULTS

According to the PCR results, N. caninum Nc5 gene was detected in organ samples of three birds (3/55, 5.45%) (Figure 1) among all wild birds. The presence of N. caninum was 2.5% (2/40) among predator wild birds. In the remaining birds, presence of N. caninum was 16.6% (1/15). This birds are not predators but eat fish, insects, and reptiles. N. caninum positive bird species were a little owl, common buzzard, and little tern.

Figure 1

Among the N. caninum positive birds, the location of common buzzard was unknown, others were detected in the Çiğli (İzmir Bird Sanctuary) district (Figure 2).

Figure 2

Nc5 amplicons from positive samples were sequenced using the Np5-Np21 primer pair, and N. caninum positivity was confirmed. The Nc5 genomic DNA region displayed homology at levels of 96%, 97%, and 98%, respectively, with a N. caninum isolated from naturally infected cattle from Italy (KP715563.1).

Phylogenetic analysis results were compatible with BLAST and N. caninum isolates were more close to KP715563.1 (Cattle 2) than other N. caninum isolates (Figure 3). Similarity rates changed from 96% to 98.07%.

Figure 3

DISCUSSION

N. caninum leads to major economic losses in livestock worldwide. For example, N. caninum causes 2.38 billion dollars’ losses per year in the USA due to abortions in cattle (15). In addition, it was reported in Spain that abortions rates in sheep and goats caused by N. caninum were 6.75% and 12.5% (27).

Globally, the prevalence of N. caninum varies between 1.5-83.6% in wild birds using PCR or serological assays in distinctive regions of the world (4). In Brazil, N. caninum DNA was detected in six out of 100 free-range chickens (28). In a study conducted in Iran, the prevalence of N. caninum using PCR was 8% in sparrows (29). In Spain, N. caninum DNA was detected in three birds (1.5%; n=200) which were two magpies and a common buzzard (16).

There is little information describing the prevalence of N. caninum in birds found in Turkey. In a study conducted in Hatay province located in southern Anatolia and Van province located in eastern Anatolia, N. caninum Nc5 gene was detected in six wild avian species among 103 wild birds (16.5%) belonging to 20 different species (1).

In our study, Neospora positivity detected by PCR in wild birds was 5.45%. To our knowledge, this is the first report showing the presence of N. caninum in little tern in Turkey and the world. This result indicates that the wild birds can be important as intermediate hosts for N. caninum transmission according to the phylogenetic analysis results, the isolates obtained from birds were found to be close to each other. Also, according to Genbank data, it was found to be closely related to isolates obtained from Italy. The reason for this is that migratory birds can carry N. caninum strains to countries in the near geographic region.

This research was carried out in İzmir and Manisa provinces of Turkey which are one of the most important resting, hunting, feeding, and breeding areas on the migration routes of wild birds. These results indicate that natural water sources can be contaminated with N. caninum oocysts as well as small animals such as rodent or wild type mouse strains containing tissue cysts that may play an important role in transmission of N. caninum to wild birds. Moreover, since wild birds that are resistant to many pathogens can transmit neosporosis as well as other important zoonotic diseases such as avian influenza, toxoplasmosis, and Acanthamoeba keratitis to humans and animals, further epidemiological studies are required on this area (1,25,30-32).

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The pictures on the map are taken from the International Union for Conservation of Nature’s Red List of Threatened Species (www. https://www.iucnredlist.org/).

* Ethics

Ethics Committee Approval: All experiments were performed under the instructions and approval of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of Ege University for animal ethical norms (Permit number: 2014-016).

Informed Consent: There is no need for patient consent information as the dead bird is being studied.

Peer-review: Internally peer-reviewed.

* Authorship Contributions

Surgical and Medical Practices: H.C., D.A., Ö.D., Concept: M.K., H.C., T.K., H.G.Ö., M.N.M., A.Y.G., M.D., Design: M.K., H.C., H.G.Ö., M.N.M., A.Y.G., M.D., Data Collection or Processing: M.K., D.A., Ö.D., T.K., E.K., M.D., Analysis or Interpretation: M.K., D.A., Ö.D., T.K., E.K., M.D., Literature Search: M.K., T.K., E.K., Writing: M.K., H.C., M.D.

Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest was declared by the authors.

Financial Disclosure: This study was supported by the grant given by the Scientific Research Projects Branch Directorate of Ege University, Turkey (grant no: 2014-TIP-073).

References

1
Muz MN, Orunç Kilinç Ö, Işler CT, Altuğ E, Karakavuk M. Bazı yabani kuşların beyin dokularında Toxoplasma gondii ve Neospora caninum’un moleküler tanısı. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg 2015; 21: 173-8.
2
Leon A, Richard E, Fortier C, Laugier C, Fortier G, Pronost S. Molecular detection of Coxiella burnetii and Neospora caninum in equine aborted foetuses and neonates. Prev Vet Med 2012; 104: 179-83.
3
Dubey JP, Schares G, Ortega-Mora LM. Epidemiology and control of neosporosis and Neospora caninum. Clin Microbiol Rev 2007; 20: 323-67. 
4
de Barros LD, Miura AC, Minutti AF, Vidotto O, Garcia JL. Neospora caninum in birds: A review. Parasitol Int 2018; 67: 397-402. 
5
Dubey JP, Ott-Joslin J, Torgerson RW, Topper MJ, Sundberg JP. Toxoplasmosis in black-faced kangaroos (Macropus fuliginosus melanops). Vet Parasitol 1988; 30: 97-105. 
6
Dubey JP, Jenkins MC, Ferreira LR, Choudhary S, Verma SK, Kwok OCH, et al. Isolation of viable Neospora caninum from brains of wild gray wolves (Canis lupus). Vet Parasitol 2014; 201: 150-3.
7
Campero LM, Venturini MC, Moore DP, Massola L, Lagomarsino H, García B, et al. Isolation and molecular characterization of a new Neospora caninum isolate from cattle in Argentina. Exp Parasitol 2015; 155: 8-12.
8
Pena HF, Soares RM, Ragozo AM, Monteiro RM, Yai LE, Nishi SM, et al. Isolation and molecular detection of Neospora caninum from naturally infected sheep from Brazil. Vet Parasitol 2007; 147: 61-6. 
9
Rodrigues AA, Gennari SM, Aguiar DM, Sreekumar C, Hill DE, Miska KB, et al. Shedding of Neospora caninum oocysts by dogs fed tissues from naturally infected water buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) from Brazil. Vet Parasitol 2004; 124: 139-50. 
10
Bień J, Moskwa B, Cabaj W. In vitro isolation and identification of the first Neospora caninum isolate from European bison (Bison bonasus bonasus L.). Vet Parasitol 2010; 173: 200-5. 
11
Vianna MC, Sreekumar C, Miska KB, Hill DE, Dubey JP. Isolation of Neospora caninum from naturally infected white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus). Vet Parasitol 2005; 129: 253-7. 
12
Calero-Bernal R, Horcajo P, Hernández M, Ortega-Mora LM, Fuentes I. Absence of Neospora caninum DNA in Human Clinical Samples, Spain. Emerg Infect Dis 2019; 25: 1226-7. 
13
Bjerkås I, Presthus J. Immuno-histochemical and ultrastructural characteristics of a cyst-forming sporozoon associated with encephalomyelitis and myositis in dogs. APMIS 1988; 96: 445-54. 
14
Petersen E, Lebech M, Jensen L, Lind P, Rask M, Bagger P, et al. Neospora caninum infection and repeated abortions in humans. Emerg Infect Dis 1999; 5: 278-80. 
15
Reichel MP, Alejandra Ayanegui-Alcérreca M, Gondim LF, Ellis JT. What is the global economic impact of Neospora caninum in cattle - the billion dollar question. Int J Parasitol 2013; 43: 133-42.
16
Darwich L, Cabezón O, Echeverria I, Pabón M, Marco I, Molina-López R, et al. Presence of Toxoplasma gondii and Neospora caninum DNA in the brain of wild birds. Vet Parasitol 2012; 183: 377-81.
17
Mansourian M, Namavari M, Khodakaram-Tafti A, Rahimian A. Experimental Neospora caninum infection in domestic bird’s embryonated eggs. J Parasit Dis 2015; 39: 241-4.
18
Mansourian M, Khodakaram-Tafti A, Namavari M. Histopathological and clinical investigations in Neospora caninum experimentally infected broiler chicken embryonated eggs. Vet Parasitol 2009; 166: 185-90.
19
Furuta PI, Mineo TW, Carrasco AO, Godoy GS, Pinto AA, Machado RZ. Neospora caninum infection in birds: experimental infections in chicken and embryonated eggs. Parasitology 2007; 134: 1931-9.
20
Bartels CJM, Wouda W, Schukken YH. Risk factors for Neospora caninum-associated abortion storms in dairy herds in the Netherlands. Q 1999 by Elsevt 1999; 52: 247-57.
21
Mineo TWP, Carrasco AOT, Raso TF, Werther K, Pinto AA, Machado RZ. Survey for natural Neospora caninum infection in wild and captive birds. Vet Parasitol 2011; 182: 352-5.
22
Otranto D, Llazari A, Testini G, Traversa D, Frangipane di Regalbono A, Badan M, et al. Seroprevalence and associated risk factors of neosporosis in beef and dairy cattle in Italy. Vet Parasitol 2003; 118: 7-18. 
23
Can H, Döşkaya M, Ajzenberg D, Özdemir HG, Caner A, İz SG, et al. Genetic characterization of Toxoplasma gondii isolates and toxoplasmosis seroprevalence in stray cats of İzmir, Turkey. PLoS One 2014; 9: e104930. 
24
Mercier A, Devillard S, Ngoubangoye B, Bonnabau H, Bañuls AL, Durand P, et al. Additional haplogroups of Toxoplasma gondii out of Africa: population structure and mouse-virulence of strains from Gabon. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2010; 4: e876. 
25
Karakavuk M, Aykur M, Şahar EA, Karakuş M, Aldemir D, Döndüren Ö, et al. First time identification of Acanthamoeba genotypes in the cornea samples of wild birds; Is Acanthamoeba keratitis making the predatory birds a target? Exp Parasitol 2017; 183: 137-42. 
26
Müller N, Zimmermann V, Hentrich B, Gottstein B. Diagnosis of Neospora caninum and Toxoplasma gondii infection by PCR and DNA hybridization immunoassay. J Clin Microbiol 1996; 34: 2850-2. 
27
Moreno B, Collantes-Fernández E, Villa A, Navarro A, Regidor-Cerrillo J, Ortega-Mora LM. Occurrence of Neospora caninum and Toxoplasma gondii infections in ovine and caprine abortions. Vet Parasitol 2012; 187: 312-8. 
28
Gonçalves IN, Uzêda RS, Lacerda GA, Moreira RR, Araújo FR, Oliveira RH, et al. Molecular frequency and isolation of cyst-forming coccidia from free ranging chickens in Bahia State, Brazil. Vet Parasitol 2012; 190: 74-9. 
29
Abdoli A, Arbabi M, Dalimi A, Pirestani M. Molecular detection of Neospora caninum in house sparrows (Passer domesticus) in Iran. Avian Pathol 2015; 44: 319-22.
30
Karakavuk M, Aldemir D, Mercier A, Atalay Şahar E, Can H, Murat JB, et al. Prevalence of toxoplasmosis and genetic characterization of Toxoplasma gondii strains isolated in wild birds of prey and their relation with previously isolated strains from Turkey. PLoS One 2018; 13: e0196159. 
31
Boynukara B, Gülhan T, Adizel Ö, Ilhan Z, Aksakal A, Durmuş A, et al. Determination of Avian Influenza A Viruses in Some Avian Species in Van Lake Basin by Real Time-PCR, Isolation and Subtyping. 2011. p. 502-10.
32
Hénaux V, Samuel MD. Avian influenza shedding patterns in waterfowl: implications for surveillance, environmental transmission, and disease spread. J Wildl Dis 2011; 47: 566-78.
2024 ©️ Galenos Publishing House