ABSTRACT

Objective:

The aim of the study was to investigate the Demodex prevalence in patients with dermatological complaints who were admitted to our hospital, and to evaluate the socio-demographic characteristics and risk factors of the patients.

Methods:

A total of 133 patients who were sent for Demodex screening were included and questionnaire for risk factors was administered. Samples were taken by standard superficial skin biopsy method and the different developmental stages were investigated under microscope.

Results:

Demodex species were found in 93 (69.9%) of the patients. Demodex folliculorum was found in 58 (62.4%) of the patients, Demodex brevis in 13 (14%), Demodex folliculorum and Demodex brevis in 4 (4.3%) and Demodex species in 18 (19.4%) of the patients. At least one of the Demodex species was found in 77.1% of patients with acne rosacea. No statistically significant relation was found between Demodex positivity and age, gender, number of weekly baths, use of makeup, and common towel use. Though statistically not significant, an increase of Demodex infestation with increasing age was observed.

Conclusion:

Demodex mite infestations are widespread worldwide without showing important racial and gender differences. In the present study, prevalence of Demodex infestation in patients with acne rosacea was high and this should be taken into consideration, when such patients are treated for their symptoms.

Keywords: Demodex, rosacea, standard superficial skin biopsy, prevalence

References

Litwin D, Chen W, Dzika E, Korycińska J. Human Permanent Ectoparasites; Recent Advances on Biology and Clinical Significance of Demodex Mites: Narrative Review Article. Iran J Parasitol 2017;12:12-21.

Elston CA, Elston DM. Demodex mites. Clin Dermatol 2014;32:739-43.

Aycan ÖM. Demodex folliculorum ve D. brevis Enfestasyonlarını Etkileyen Faktörler (Doktora Tezi). M. Atambay (Danışman): T.C. İnönü Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü. 2008.

Moran EM, Foley R, Powell FC. Demodex and rosacea revisited. Clin Dermatol 2017;35:195-200.

Yolasığmaz A, Budak S. Demodicosis. In: Özcel MA editors. Tıbbi Parazit Hastalıkları kitabında. İzmir: Meta Basım; 2007.p.891-4.

Zhao YE, Guo N, Xun M, Xu JR, Wang M, Wang DL. Sociodemographic characteristics and risk factor analysis of Demodex infestation (Acari: Demodicidae). J Zhejiang Univ Sci B 2011;12:998-1007

Horváth A, Neubrandt DM, Ghidán Á, Nagy K. Risk factors and prevalence of Demodex mites in young adults. Acta Microbiol Immunol Hung 2011;58:145-55.

Orak F, Yıldırım D, Set A, Hasbek M. Yüzeyel Cilt Biyopsisi Yapılan Hastalarda Demodex spp. Sıklığının Araştırılması. ANKEM Derg 2015;29:90-4.

Aycan ÖM, Otlu GH, Karaman Ü, Daldal N, Artambay M. Çeşitli Hasta ve Yaş Gruplarında Demodex spp. Görülme Sıklığı. Türkiye Parazitoloji Dergisi 2007;31:115-8.

Karaman Ü, Kolören Z, Enginyurt Ö, Özer A. The epidemiology of demodex mites at the college students living in dormitories in the city of Ordu. Turkiye Parazitol Derg 2014;38:166-71.

Durmaz S, Yula E, Aycan Kaya O, Aksoy Gokmen A, Kılınç C, Atambay M, et al. Sociodemographic characteristics of patients with Demodex brevis and Demodex folliculorum infestation and its association with rosacea and Behçet’s disease. Biomedical Research 2015;26:549-55.

Erbağci Z, Ozgöztaşi O. The significance of Demodex folliculorum density in rosacea. Int J Dermatol 1998;37:421-5.

Demirdağ HG, Özcan H, Gürsoy Ş, Beker Akbulut G. The effects of sebum configuration on Demodex spp. Density. Turk J Med Sci 2016; 46:1415-21.

Yücel A, Yilmaz M. Investigation of the prevalance of Demodex folliculorum and Demodex brevis in rosacea patients. Turkiye Parazitol Derg 2013;37:195-8.

Tilki E, Zeytun E, Doğan S. Prevalence and Density of Demodex folliculorum and Demodex brevis (Acari: Demodicidae) in Erzincan Province. Turkiye Parazitol Derg 2017;41:80-6.

Zeytun E, Tilki E, Doğan S, Mumcuoğlu KY. The effect of skin moisture, pH, and temperature on the density of Demodex folliculorum and Demodex brevis (Acari:Demodicidae) in students and staff of the Erzincan University, Turkey. Int J Dermatol 2017;56:762-6.

Kaplan M, Keleştemur N, Başpınar S. Demodex spp. Prevalence among University Students. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg 2012;18(Suppl-A):A43-6.

Cengiz ZT, Yılmaz H, Özkol HU, Ekici A, Ödemiş N. The prevalence of Demodex spp. in patients admitted to the parasitology laboratory of the Dursun Odabaş Medical Center in Yüzüncü Yıl University, Van]. Turkiye Parazitol Derg 2014;38:9-11.

Roihu T, Kariniemi AL. Demodex mites in acne rosacea. J Cutan Pathol 1998;25:550-2.

Özdemir H, Özer E, Özdemir S, Alkanat M. The prevalance of Demodex species in faculty of health science students. Arch Turk Dermatol Venereol 2015;49:139-41.

Isa NH, Loong LW, Fang GH, Mohamad AM, Razali N, Rani NI, et al. Demodicosis among university medical students in Malaysia and the effects of facial cleanser and moisturizer usage. S Asian J Trop Med Public Health 2011;42:1375-80.

Özdemir MH, Aksoy U, Sönmez E, Akisu C,Yorulmaz C, Hilal A. Prevalence of Demodex in health personnel working in the autopsy room. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 2005;26:18-23.

Sönmez Ö, Yalçın ZG, Karakeçe E, Çiftçi İH, Erdem T. Associations between Demodex species infestation and various types of cancer. Acta Parasitol 2013;58: 551-5.

Lacey N, Kavanagh K, Tseng SC. Under the lash: Demodex mites in human diseases. Biochem (Lond) 2009;31:2-6.

Van Zuuren EJ. Rosacea. N Engl J Med 2017;377:1754-64.

Forton FM. Papulopustular rosacea, skin immunity and Demodex: pityriasis folliculorum as a missing link. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2012;26:19-28.

Lacey N, Russell-Hallinan A, Zouboulis CC, Powell FC. Demodex mites modulate sebocyte immune reaction: Possible role in the pathogenesis of rosacea. Br J Dermatol 2018;179:420-30.

The Presence of Demodex Mites in Patients with Dermatologic Symptoms of the Face

ABSTRACT

References