Investigation of Zoonotic <i>Cryptosporidium</i> and <i>Giardia intestinalis</i> Species and Genotypes in Cats (Felis catus)
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
Original Investigation
P: 252-256
December 2021

Investigation of Zoonotic Cryptosporidium and Giardia intestinalis Species and Genotypes in Cats (Felis catus)

Turkiye Parazitol Derg 2021;45(4):252-256
1. Erciyes University Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Parasitology, Kayseri, Turkey
2. Ondokuz Mayıs University Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Samsun, Turkey
3. Ondokuz Mayıs University Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Preclinical Science, Samsun, Turkey
No information available.
No information available
Received Date: 31.03.2021
Accepted Date: 17.09.2021
Publish Date: 02.12.2021
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

ABSTRACT

Objective:

Giardia intestinalis and Cryptosporidium spp. are important zoonotic protozoan parasites that infect humans and various animals. We investigated the occurrence of G. intestinalis and Cryptosporidium spp. infection in cats. To provide data on the zoonotic transmission dynamics of these parasites, genotypes of the detected isolates were investigated through DNA sequence characterization.

Methods:

A total of 100 fecal samples were collected from cats between June and October 2020 in Kayseri and Samsun provinces. Fecal samples were examined by nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR), targeting the β-giardin gene of G. intestinalis and small subunit (SSU) rRNA gene of Cryptosporidium spp. All PCR products were sequenced for genotyping.

Results:

Of the samples examined, Giardia intestinalis was determined in 8 samples (8.0%), whereas none of the samples were found positive for Cryptosporidium spp. Sequence analyses of the β-giardin PCR products indicated that all G. intestinalis isolates were classed into the zoonotic assemblage B.

Conclusion:

This study adds to the current data on the molecular epidemiology of cryptosporidiosis and giardiasis in cats. The findings also highlight the potential risk of cats for public health concerning the zoonotic transmission dynamics of G. intestinalis.

Keywords: Giardia intestinalis, Cryptosporidium spp., cat, molecular characterization, genotyping

INTRODUCTION

Giardia intestinalis and Cryptosporidium spp. are common and significant zoonotic protozoan parasites causing diarrhea and infect gastrointestinal tracts of humans and animals (1). These two pathogens can be transmitted to humans through the consumption of contaminated food or water and direct or indirect contact with infected animals or persons (2). Cystic stages of G. intestinalis and thick walled oocyts of Cryptosporidium spp. are highly resistant and can remain infectious for long periods in environments with suitable temperature and humidity conditions (3-5). The two pathogens are transmitted primarily through the fecal-oral route and have been responsible for waterborne outbreaks worldwide (5,6).

To date, 73 genotypes of 42 Cryptosporidium species have been identified in various hosts by molecular analyses (1,7). Cryptosporidium hominis and C. parvum are recognized as the most important species responsible for human infections (8). Cryptosporidium felis is the main species in cats but C. hominis, C. parvum, C. muris, and C. ubiquitum have also been occasionally detected (2,5,9,10).

Giardia intestinalis is a multi-complex species, with eight (A to H) distinct assemblages with different host specificities (5,11). Cats primarily tend to be infected with host-adapted assemblages with assemblage F. However, other assemblages, including assemblages A-E have also been identified in cats (12).

Although the prevalence and molecular characterization of feline Giardia and Cryptosporidium infections have been investigated worldwide (5,13-17), limited data is available on the presence of these protozoans in cats and their genotypes in Turkey (18,19-31). Thus, we aimed to investigate Cryptosporidium spp. and G. intestinalis in cats in Kayseri and Samsun provinces and identify the genotypes of the detected isolates for evaluating the zoonotic potential of these pathogens.

METHODS

Collection of Fecal Samples

A total of 100 fresh fecal specimens were collected from cats admitted to the Veterinary Education, Research and Practice Hospital for their routine health examinations in Samsun and Kayseri provinces between June and October 2020. The feces were collected in universal plastic tubes using sterile disposable gloves by the owner after defecation and placed into plastic bags.The bags were marked with age, breed, and geographic region of collection. All samples were transported to the laboratory and preserved at -20 °C until used for the genomic DNA extraction.

Genomic DNA Extraction and Nested PCR Amplification of SSU rRNA and β-giardin Gene

Total genomic DNA was extracted from 200 mg of the individual fecal sample using QIAamp® DNA Stool Mini Kit (Qiagen, Germany). The feces for DNA extraction were primarily subjected to five freezing with liquid nitrogen/thawing (with boiling water) to ensure efficient lysis of oocysts/cysts before extraction protocol. Qubit Nanodrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) was used to measure DNA concentration. The extracted genomic DNA was stored at -20 °C until used for the PCR analyses.

The presence of Cryptosporidium spp. and G. intestinalis were screened by nested PCR analyses targeting a 850 bp and ~530 bp fragment of small subunit (SSU) rRNA gene and of the β-giardin gene, respectively (20,21). The primers and cycling conditions of both SSU rRNA and β-giardin genes were performed as previously described (20,21). Positive (genomic DNA of bovine C. parvum and G. intestinalis positive fecal samples) and negative (ddH2O) controls were included in each PCR run. The secondary PCR products were visualized on 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis with GelRed™ gel stain (Biotium, Inc., Hayward, CA, USA).

Sequencing and Phylogenetic Analysis

All PCR positive products were purified using the High Pure PCR Product Purification Kit (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Germany). The purified products were sequenced in both directions by the same PCR primers in a Genetic Analyser ABI 3130 XL (Macrogen, Amsterdam, the Netherlands). For the remove to low quality reads from the raw sequence, the DNA sequences obtained were trimmed and then edited using Geneious Prime 2020.0.3 software (https://www.geneious.com). Sequences were aligned with reference sequences downloaded from GenBank to determine the Cryptosporidium species identity and G. intestinalis genotypes.

Phylogenetic analyses based on the β-giardin data set of G. intestinalis were performed using the maximum likelihood method (ML) with 1.000 replicates bootstrap values, using in mega 7 software (22,23).

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis has not been made in this study.

RESULTS

Occurence of Cryptosporidium and G. intestinalis in Cats

No samples were found as positive for Cryptosporidium spp. G. intestinalis was detected in 8 (8.0%) out of 100 fecal samples by nested PCR analyses of β-giardin gene region.

Giardia intestinalis Assemblage

A 490 bp fragment of the β-giardin gene was successfully obtained from all positive isolates. The assemblage and distrubution of G. intestinalis in the cats are presented in Table 1. The BLASTn (Basic Local Alignment Search Tool) analyses of the sequences showed that all isolates were genetically identical (100%) to each other. According to the β-giardin sequence analysis, all of the G. intestinalis isolates were identified as zoonotic assemblages B. All nucleotide sequences obtained in this study were deposited in GenBank database under accession numbers MW727284-86.

Table 1

Phylogenetic Analysis

The ML tree is shown in Figure 1 with bootstrap values. Based on the phylogenetic analysis, all sequences from the present study were clustered within assemblage B comprising species mostly (or only) infecting humans and several other mammals such as livestocks, dogs and cats. The phylogenetic tree indicated that all obtained sequences clustered with human and cat G. intestinalis assemblage B sequences which is distant from the other G. intestinalis assemblages (Figure 1). Our sequences exhibited 100% homology with isolates reported from humans in Turkey (MT166367), China (KY696836), Mozambique (MT332804), USA (MT713323), and Kenya (LC436567). The sequences also showed 99.78% identity with the cat isolates reported from Turkey (MH648153-55).

Figure 1

DISCUSSION

Although there have been many molecular epidemiological studies on the prevalence of Cryptosporidium and G. intestinalis infections in water sources and various animal hosts in Turkey (24-30), there are limited molecular survey on detecting genotypes and the presence of these parasites in cats (18,19,31). Therefore, the present study is contributed to molecular data on determining genotype distribution, and presence of zoonotic protozoans.

The prevalence of Cryptosporidium spp. infection in cats has been reported in the range between 0% and 29.4% in the world and these prevalence differences have been related to studied cat populations as well as different diagnostic techniques (5,12). However, the prevalence of this protozoon in cats with the coprological examination and molecular techniques has been reported from 1% to 13% in Turkey (18,31-33). In the present study, none of the cats were determined positive for Cryptosporidium spp. A similar finding was also reported in a study in Italy (34). However, some authors reported that the absence of cryptosporidiosis in cats has led to sporadic character of the diseases (34,35).

Giardia intestinalis infection in cats has been reported in many countries. We found similar results with the previous studies in Denmark (7.0%) and Spain (9.2%) (12,34). However, our results were lower than previously reported in studies from Australia (10.1%), Thailand (12.1%), Germany (10.5%), and Brasil (11.1%) (5,10,36,37) and higher than the findings of studies from China (3.6%) and Italy (6.1%) (2,34). One recent study reported the molecular detection of G. intestinalis in cats with diarrhea in the Central Anatolia Region of Turkey with 68.6% prevalence. Infection rate determined in the present study was lower than previous report (68.6%) in Turkey (19).

The role of pet animals as an important source of human giardiasis was extensively discussed. Some researchers showed that pet animals play an important role as reservoirs of zoonotic assemblage and transmission from these animals to humans (38,39). Cats are primarily infected with feline-specific G. intestinalis assemblage F (12). However, the assemblages A, B, C, D, and, E have also been occasionally reported in cats (12). In this study, we determined the presence of potentially human‐pathogenic assemblages B, with sequence analyses of β-giardin gene in the cats. This result is consistent with the previous reports in cats from different regions around the world (40-44). To date, there has been only one report on G. intestinalis in cats in Turkey (19) indicating the presence of assemblage B which is consistent with the findigs of current study. In addition, assemblage B is dominant in human, dog, and drinking/environmental waters in Turkey (26,45-47). Host-adapted G. intestinalis assemblage F has been also reported in humans. Thus, cats might be a potential reservoir for human giardiasis (48,49).

CONCLUSION

This study provides important data on molecular characterization of G. intestinalis in cats in Turkey indicating the occurrence of zoonotic assemblage B. Further studies are necessary to determine the molecular epidemiology of Cryptosporidium spp. and G. intestinalis in cats with large-scale sampling in the different geographic regions of Turkey and to reveal potential risk factors for public health.

* Ethics

Ethics Committee Approval: As fecal material was obtained by the owner after defecating animals, there was no need to ethical approval. There are no human patients in the study.

Informed Consent: A consent form was completed by all participants.

Peer-review: Externally and internally peer-reviewed.

* Authorship Contributions

Concept: Z.Ö., D.P., G.Z.P., A.Y., Design: Z.Ö., G.Z.P., A.Y., Ö.D., A.İ., Data Collection or Processing: D.P., Z.Ö., G.Y., G.Z.P., Analysis or Interpretation: Z.Ö., A.Y., G.Y., N.D.K., A.Ç., Literature Search: Z.Ö., A.Y., Ö.D., A.İ., G.Y., N.D.K., Writing: Z.Ö., Ö.D., A.Y., D.P., G.Z.P.

Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest was declared by the authors.

Financial Disclosure: The authors declared that this study received no financial support.

References

1
de Aquino MCC, Inácio SV, Rodrigues FS, de Barros LD, Garcia JL, Headley SA, et al. Cryptosporidiosis and giardiasis in buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis). Front Vet Sci 2020; 7: 557967. 
2
Li W, Liu X, Gu Y, Liu J, Luo J. Prevalence of Cryptosporidium, Giardia, Blastocystis, and trichomonads in domestic cats in East China. J Vet Med Sci 2019; 81: 890-6. 
3
Yoshiuchi R, Matsubayashi M, Kimata I, Furuya M, Tani H, Sasai K. Survey and molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium and Giardia spp. in owned companion animal, dogs and cats, in Japan. Vet Parasitol 2010; 174: 313-6.
4
Surl CG, Jung BD, Park BK, Kim HC. Resistance of Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts following commercial bleach treatment. Korean J Vet Res 2011; 51: 101-5.
5
Yang R, Ying JL, Monis P, Ryan U. Molecular characterisation of Cryptosporidium and Giardia in cats (Felis catus) in Western Australia. Exp Parasitol 2015; 155: 13-8. 
6
Baldursson S, Karanis P. Waterborne transmission of protozoan parasites: review of worldwide outbreaks - an update 2004-2010. Water Res 2011; 45: 6603-14.
7
Ježková J, Prediger J, Holubová N, Sak B, Konečný R, Feng Y, et al. Cryptosporidium ratti n. sp. (Apicomplexa: Cryptosporidiidae) and genetic diversity of Cryptosporidium spp. in brown rats (Rattus norvegicus) in the Czech Republic. Parasitology 2021; 148: 84-97.
8
Xiao L. Molecular epidemiology of cryptosporidiosis: an update. Exp Parasitol 2010; 124: 80-9. 
9
Xu H, Jin Y, Wu W, Li P, Wang L, Li N, et al. Genotypes of Cryptosporidium spp., Enterocytozoon bieneusi and Giardia duodenalis in dogs and cats in Shanghai, China. Parasit Vectors 2016; 9: 121.
10
Tangtrongsup S, Scorza AV, Reif JS, Ballweber LR, Lappin MR, Salman MD. Seasonal distributions and other risk factors for Giardia duodenalis and Cryptosporidium spp. infections in dogs and cats in Chiang Mai, Thailand. Prev Vet Med 2020; 174: 104820.
11
Ryan U, Cacciò SM. Zoonotic potential of Giardia. Int J Parasitol 2013; 43: 943-56.
12
Enemark HL, Starostka TP, Larsen B, Takeuchi-Storm N, Thamsborg SM. Giardia and Cryptosporidium infections in Danish cats: risk factors and zoonotic potential. Parasitol Res 2020; 119: 2275-86. 
13
Hoopes JH, Polley L, Wagner B, Jenkins EJ. A retrospective investigation of feline gastrointestinal parasites in western Canada. Can Vet J 2013; 54: 359-62.
14
Scorza V, Willmott A, Gunn-Moore D, Lappin MR. Cryptosporidium felis in faeces from cats in the UK. Vet Rec 2014; 174: 609. 
15
Bouzid M, Halai K, Jeffreys D, Hunter PR. The prevalence of Giardia infection in dogs and cats, a systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence studies from stool samples. Vet Parasitol 2015; 207: 181-202.
16
Ito Y, Itoh N, Kimura Y, Kanai K. Molecular detection and characterization of Cryptosporidium spp. among breeding cattery cats in Japan. Parasitol Res 2016; 115: 2121-3. 
17
Kostopoulou D, Claerebout E, Arvanitis D, Ligda P, Voutzourakis N, Casaert S, et al. Abundance, zoonotic potential and risk factors of intestinal parasitism amongst dog and cat populations: The scenario of Crete, Greece. Parasit Vectors 2017; 10: 43.
18
Sursal N, Simsek E, Yildiz K. Occurrence and first molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium felis in a cat in Turkey. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg 2020; 26: 833-7.
19
Sursal N, Simsek E, Yildiz K. Feline giardiasis in turkey: prevalence and genetic and haplotype diversity of Giardia duodenalis based on the β-giardin gene sequence in symptomatic cats. J Parasitol 2020; 106: 699-706.
20
Xiao L, Escalante L, Yang C, Sulaiman I, Escalante AA, Montali RJ, et al. Phylogenetic analysis of Cryptosporidium parasites based on the small-subunit rRNA gene locus. Appl Environ Microbiol 1999; 65: 1578-83. 
21
Sulaiman IM, Jiang J, Singh A, Xiao L. Distribution of Giardia duodenalis genotypes and subgenotypes in raw urban wastewater in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Appl Environ Microbiol 2004; 70: 3776-80. 
22
Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 7.0 for Bigger Datasets. Mol Biol Evol 2016; 33: 1870-4. 
23
Darriba D, Taboada GL, Doallo R, Posada D. jModelTest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nat Methods 2012; 9: 772. 
24
Koloren Z, Ayaz E. Genotyping of Cryptosporidium spp. in environmental water in Turkey. Acta Parasitol 2016; 61: 671-9. 
25
Taylan-Ozkan A, Yasa-Duru S, Usluca S, Lysen C, Ye J, Roellig DM, et al. Cryptosporidium species and Cryptosporidium parvum subtypes in dairy calves and goat kids reared under traditional farming systems in Turkey. Exp Parasitol 2016; 170: 16-20. 
26
Koloren Z, Seferoğlu O, Karanis P. Occurency of Giardia duodenalis assemblages in river water sources of Black Sea, Turkey. Acta Trop 2016; 164: 337-44. 
27
Demircan K, Onder Z, Duzlu O, Yildirim A, Okur M, Ciloglu A, et al. First molecular detection and phylogenetic analyses of zoonotic Giardia intestinalis in horses in Turkey. J Equine Vet Sci 2019; 80: 56-60. 
28
Kabir MHB, Ceylan O, Ceylan C, Shehata AA, Bando H, Essa MI, et al. Molecular detection of genotypes and subtypes of Cryptosporidium infection in diarrheic calves, lambs, and goat kids from Turkey. Parasitol Int 2020; 79: 102163. 
29
Yildirim A, Adanir R, Inci A, Yukari BA, Duzlu O, Onder Z, et al. Prevalence and genotyping of bovine Cryptosporidium species in the Mediterranean and Central Anatolia Region of Turkey. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis 2020; 69: 101425.
30
Onder Z, Simsek E, Duzlu O, Yetismis G, Ciloglu A, Okur M, et al. Molecular prevalence and genotyping of Giardia duodenalis in cattle in Central Anatolia Region of Turkey. Parasitol Res 2020; 119: 2927-34. 
31
Orunc Kilinc O, Yilmaz AB, Goz Y, Ozkan C, Denizhan V. Determination of Cryptosporidium spp. in Van cats by nested PCR. Med Weter 2018; 74: 456-9.
32
Korkmaz UF, Gökpınar S, Yıldız K. Prevalence of intestinal parasites in cats and their importance in terms of public health. Turkiye Parazitol Derg 2016; 40: 194-8. 
33
Goz Y, Yuksek N, Altug N, Ceylan E, Deger S. Prevalence of Cryptosporidium infection in Van cats. Indian Vet J 2005; 82: 995-6.
34
Paoletti B, Otranto D, Weigl S, Giangaspero A, Di Cesare A, Traversa D. Prevalence and genetic characterization of Giardia and Cryptosporidium in cats from Italy. Res Vet Sci 2011; 91: 397-9. 
35
Gow AG, Gow DJ, Hall EJ, Langton D, Clarke C, Papasouliotis K. Prevalence of potentially pathogenic enteric organisms in clinically healthy kittens in the UK. J Feline Med Surg. 2009; 11: 655-62. 
36
Sotiriadou I, Pantchev N, Gassmann D, Karanis P. Molecular identification of Giardia and Cryptosporidium from dogs and cats. Parasite 2013; 20: 8. 
37
Moreira ADS, Baptista CT, Brasil CL, Valente JSS, Bruhn FRP, Pereira DIB. Risk factors and infection due to Cryptosporidium spp. in dogs and cats in southern Rio Grande do Sul. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet 2018; 27: 113-8. 
38
Lalle M, Pozio E, Capelli G, Bruschi F, Crotti D, Cacciò SM. Genetic heterogeneity at the beta-giardin locus among human and animal isolates of Giardiaduodenalis and identification of potentially zoonotic subgenotypes. Int J Parasitol 2005; 35: 207-13. 
39
Marangi M, Berrilli F, Otranto D, Giangaspero A. Genotyping of Giardia duodenalis among children and dogs in a closed socially deprived community from Italy. Zoonoses Public Health 2010; 57: e54-8. 
40
van Keulen H, Macechko PT, Wade S, Schaaf S, Wallis PM, Erlandsen SL. Presence of human Giardia in domestic, farm and wild animals, and environmental samples suggests a zoonotic potential for giardiasis. Vet Parasitol 2002; 108: 97-107. 
41
Read CM, Monis PT, Thompson RC. Discrimination of all genotypes of Giardia duodenalis at the glutamate dehydrogenase locus using PCR-RFLP. Infect Genet Evol 2004; 4: 125-30. 
42
Jaros D, Zygner W, Jaros S, Wedrychowicz H. Detection of Giardia intestinalis assemblages A, B and D in domestic cats from Warsaw, Poland. Pol J Microbiol 2011; 60: 259-63. 
43
McDowall RM, Peregrine AS, Leonard EK, Lacombe C, Lake M, Rebelo AR, et al. Evaluation of the zoonotic potential of Giardia duodenalis in fecal samples from dogs and cats in Ontario. Can Vet J 2011; 52: 1329-33.
44
Iijima Y, Itoh N, Ito Y, Kimura Y. Multilocus genotyping of Giardia duodenalis isolates from household cats and pet shop kittens. Vet Parasitol 2018; 259: 44-8. 
45
Değerli S, Değerli N, Çeliksöz A, Özçelik S. Genotyping of Giardia intestinalis isolated from people living in Sivas, Turkey. Turk J Med Sci 2012; 42(Suppl 1): 1268-72.
46
Aydin AF, Besirbellioglu BA, Avci IY, Tanyuksel M, Araz E, Pahsa A. Classification of Giardia duodenalis parasites in Turkey into groups A and B using restriction fragment length polymorphism. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2004; 50: 147-51.
47
Balcıoğlu C, Kurt Ö, Sevil N, Dağcı H, Tetik A, Ergunay K, et al. Genotyping of Giardia lamblia in a cohort of Turkish patients: A search for a relationship between symptoms and genotypes. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg 2012; 18(Suppl-A): A125-A131.
48
Gelanew T, Lalle M, Hailu A, Pozio E, Cacciò SM. Molecular characterization of human isolates of Giardia duodenalis from Ethiopia. Acta Trop 2007; 102: 92-9.
49
Sprong H, Cacciò SM, van der Giessen JW; ZOOPNET network and partners. Identification of zoonotic genotypes of Giardia duodenalis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2009; 3: e558.
2024 ©️ Galenos Publishing House