First Record, Distribution and Occurrence of A Protistan Entomopathogen, <i>Adelina mesnili</i> Perez (Coccidia: Adeleidae) in the Indian Meal Moth, <i>Plodia interpunctella</i> (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) Populations in Türkiye
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
Original Investigation
P: 151-155
September 2023

First Record, Distribution and Occurrence of A Protistan Entomopathogen, Adelina mesnili Perez (Coccidia: Adeleidae) in the Indian Meal Moth, Plodia interpunctella (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) Populations in Türkiye

Turkiye Parazitol Derg 2023;47(3):151-155
1. Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University, Faculty of Arts and Science, Department of Biology, Bolu, Türkiye
2. Ordu University Faculty of Arts and Science, Department of Molecular Biology and Genetic, Ordu, Türkiye
No information available.
No information available
Received Date: 28.03.2022
Accepted Date: 25.05.2023
Publish Date: 18.09.2023
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

ABSTRACT

Objective:

Plodia interpunctella (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) originating from South America is one of the important insect pests that damages storage products and is found on every continent. There is a new interest in using enthomopathogens for microbial control of P. interpunctella as well as other stored product pests. Coccidia as a group of protistan entomopathogens are host specific and their pathogenic effects on the hosts are more pronounced. Although this pathogenic effect results in increased host mortality or higher susceptibility to insecticides, the suppressive potential of coccidia in natural populations has not been adequately studied. In this study, characterization, distribution and occurrence of a coccidian entomopathogen was aim to show its natural suppressing potential in P. interpunctella populations.

Methods:

During the three years (from 2019 to 2021), a total of 3.432 P. interpunctella samples (2.047 dead and 413 living larvae, 932 adults and 40 pupae) were collected from fourteen populations. After macroscopic examination, suspected samples were dissected in Ringer’s solution and then prepared wet smears including host fat body were examined for presence of coccidian pathogens under a light microscope at a magnification of 400-1000X. The oocysts of the coccidian were measured and photographed using a microscope with a digital camera and soft imaging system.

Results:

The pathogen was observed in the fat bodies of the larvae, pupae and adults. Oocysts measured as 29.52±3.32 (25.27- 35.08) μm in diameter and they include 8 sporocysts. Sporocysts measured as 9.11±0.61 (8.90-9.85) μm. Forty-five of 3.432 P. interpunctella larvae, pupae and adults were found to be infected. Coccidian infections have also reached to the levels that can be considered high in some populations, as significant as 29.2%. The infection was observed in the three (21.4%) of the examined fourteen populations.

Conclusion:

The coccidian entomopathogen presented in this study is the first Adeleid coccidian record from P. interpunctella populations in Türkiye. The detection of Adelina mesnili Perez (Coccidia: Adeleidae) in at least three populations and the infection rate reaching 29.2 percent, confirms that this pathogen has a considerable effect P. interpunctella populations that cannot be underestimated. Our results confirm that the coccidian pathogen is very effective in the larval stage.

Keywords: Plodia interpunctella, Adelina mesnili, stored product pest, distribution, biological control

INTRODUCTION

Plodia interpunctella (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) originating from South America is one of the important insect pests that damages storage products and is found on every continent. It is a harmful species in a wide range of products such as dried figs, dried apricots, hazelnuts, raisins, oil seeds, cereals, flour and products, cocoa and spices. P. interpunctella larvae feed both inside and on the surface of the food. The infestation of P. interpunctella causes direct crop loss and economic cost.

There is a new interest in using enthomopathogens for microbial control of P. interpunctella as well as other stored product pests (1,2). Among the entomopathogens, protistan entomopathogens are often prevalent and persistent in natural populations of pest insects. Coccidia as a group of protistan entomopathogens are all intracellular parasites and multiply extensively in the host insect. Most species are host specific. Coccidia carry out extensive and more multiplication cycles in the insect host, so the pathogenic effects on the host are more pronounced (3). Although this pathogenic effect results in increased host mortality or higher susceptibility to insecticides, the suppressive potential of coccidia in natural populations has not been adequately studied. In this study, characterization, distribution and occurrence of a coccidian entomopathogen were studied to show its natural suppressing potential in P. interpunctella populations.

METHODS

Insect Samples

During the three years (from 2019 to 2021), a total of 3.312 P. interpunctella samples (2.032 dead and 413 living larvae, 830 adults and 37 pupae) were collected from warehouses, shops and houses in the fourteen provinces (Ankara, Aydın, Bolu, Denizli, Gaziantep, Isparta, İstanbul, İzmir, Kastamonu, Malatya, Ordu, Samsun, Siirt and Trabzon), widely dispersed geographically in Türkiye (Table 1).

Table 1

Macroscopic-microscopic Examinations

Insect specimens suspected of having disease were subjected to macroscopic examination. The most common symptoms in larvae were discolored death, slow movement, loss of appetite. After macroscopic examination, suspected samples were dissected in Ringer’s solution and then prepared wet smears including host fat body were examined for presence of coccidian pathogens under a light microscope at a magnification of 400-1000X. When an infection was found, the slides were air-dried and fixed with methanol, then stained with freshly prepared 5% solution of Giemsa stain. They were then washed in running tap water, air-dried and examined under a microscope (4). The oocysts of the coccidian pathogen detected by the light microscopy were measured and photographed using a microscope with a digital camera and soft imaging system.

Statistical Analysis

A chi-square test was used to compare observed results. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

During the microscopic observations, a coccidian entomopathogen were found in the populations of P. interpunctella in Türkiye. The pathogen was observed in the fat bodies of the larvae, pupae and adults. Polysporocystic oocysts of the pathogen were the evidence of the infection (Figures 1-3). Oocysts measured as 29.52±3.32 (25.27-35.08) µm in diameter and they include 8 sporocysts. Sporocysts measured as 9.11±0.61 (8.90-9.85) µm.

Figure 1-3

During the study, 3.432 samples of P. interpunctella samples including larvae, adults and pupa were dissected and searched for the coccidian infections in the fourteen localities of Türkiye between the years 2019-2021. Totally, 2.047 dead and 413 living larvae, 932 adults and 40 pupae were examined for the presence of the coccidian pathogen, 45 of 3.432 P. interpunctella larvae, pupae and adults were found to be infected. Total infection occurred as 1.3% for the pathogen (Table 2). On the other hand, the average of coccidian infections for all populations was found as 0.2% for dead larvae, 0.2% for living larvae and 4.2% for adults. Coccidian infections have also reached to the levels that can be considered high in some populations, as significant as 29.2% (Tables 2, 3). The infection was observed in the three (21.4%) of the examined fourteen populations (Figure 4).

Table 2
Table 3
Figure 4

DISCUSSION

Light microscopic observations of the fresh and Giemsa-stained preperations indicate that the coccidian pathogen found in P. interpunctella populations belongs to the genus Adelina. The recorded parasite has typical characters of the genus Adelina such as shape and size of oocysts (Figures 1-3), number (3-30) of sporocyst per oocyst and number of sporozoites per sporocyst (3). In the literature there is no coccidian record from P. interpunctella populations in Türkiye. The Coccidian entomopathogen presented in this study is the first Adeleid coccidian record from P. interpunctella populations in Türkiye. Number of sporocyst per oocyst and the host affinity is generally recognized as a valid taxonomic character to discriminate the pathogen at the species level. According to Yaman et al. (2), up to now fifteen species belonging to the genus Adelina have been described from host insects; their distinctive characteristics are shown in Table 4. The oocyst dimension and sporocyst number per oocyst is a good feature for comparison of the fifteen Adelina species from host insects. As seen in Table 4, our coccidian differs from thirteen Adelina species in oocyst size and similar with Adelina mesnili (8 sporocysts per oocysts). The number of sporocyst in an oocyst varies from 6 to 8 with 8 being the most common. Pérez (5) recorded the number of sporocysts in each of A. mesnili as generally 6 to 8, rarely 9 in the original description. The morphological features of the pathogen show similarities with other species of the genus Adelina (Coccidia: Adeleidae) and especially resembles A. mesnili, described in lepidopteran hosts by Pérez (5) and observed in the artificial cultures of P. interpunctella and Ephestia kühniella by Steinhaus (6). Therefore, the coccidian pathogen was identified as the Turkish strain of A. mesnili. A. mesnili found in the present study was observed first in the larvae, pupae and adults of P. interpunctella in Türkiye.

Table 4

No statistical difference between both dead and living larvae was found. As seen in Table 3, the infection rates in the adults are higher than those in pupae. There is statistically significant difference in the infection levels of adult and pupa of P. interpunctella (Pearson chi-square, p=0.000 <0.05). Coccidians occur naturally in Lepidoptera. So, have been recognized as potential biocontrol agents against Lepidoptera. However, the use of pathogenic protist species as a control agent should be in the early stages of development. At the same time, extensive research is required to be used as a protective agent (7).

There have been several studies on pathogens and parasites of stored-product pests, mainly focused on isolation and characterization of pathogenic microorganisms. A few of them were carried out on the protistan entomopathogens of P. inteerpunctella. Until now, microsporidian pathogens, Nosema plodiae (8,9), Vairimorpha plodia (1,10-12), neogregarine pathogen, Mattesia dispora (13), gregarine pathogen, Leidyana sp. (14), have been studied as microbial pathogen in P. interpunctella. However, there is only one study on the distribution, occurrence and potential of microsporidian entomopathogen, V. plodia in P. interpunctella under natural conditions (1). There is no any study on distribution, occurrence and potential of microbial pathogens about A. mesnili (Coccidia: Adeleidae) in P. interpunctella under the natural conditions. In this study, characterization, distribution and occurrence of the coccidian entomopathogen of P. interpunctella from 14 localities representing all Türkiye between the years 2019-2021 is given in an extensive field study for the first time by confirming its first record from Türkiye and effectiveness on natural populations. A. mesnili was detected in three populations (21.4%).

CONCLUSION

Coccidians occurring naturally in insect pest populations are highly pathogenic for them, therefore they have been considered as potential natural suppressing factor in insect pest populations. The detection of A. mesnili in at least three populations and the infection rate reaching 29.2 percent, confirms that this pathogen has a considerable effect in P. interpuctella populations that cannot be underestimated.

Ethics

Ethics Committee Approval: Ethics committee approval is not required as it is studied on harmful insects.

Informed Consent: N/A.

Peer-review: Externally peer-reviewed.

Authorship Contributions

Concept: M.Y., Design: M.Y., Data Collection or Processing: T.S., Ö.E., Analysis or Interpretation: M.Y., T.S., Ö.E., Literature Search: M.Y., T.S., Ö.E., Writing: M.Y., T.S.

Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest was declared by the authors.

Financial Disclosure: The study was financially supported with a research project by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Türkiye (project no: 118O980).

References

1
Sağlam T, Yaman M, Ertürk Ö. Distribution and occurrence of Vairimorpha plodiae (Opisthokonta: Microspora) in the indian meal moth, Plodia interpunctella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) populations: An extensive field study Acta Protozool 2021; 60: 31-6.
2
Yaman M, Sağlam T, Ertürk Ö. Entomopathogens as biological control of the mediterranean flour moth, Ephestia kuehniella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). ACU J For Fa 2021; 22: 338-44.
3
Solter LF, Becnel JJ, Vávra J. Research methods for entomopathogenic microsporidia and other protists. In: Second E editors. Lacey LABT-M of T in IP. Manual of Techniques in Invertebrate Pathology. Academic Press, San Diego; 2012.p.329-71.
4
Yaman M, Acar KF, Radek R. First record of the entomopathogenic protist, Mattesia dispora (Neogregarinorida: Lipotrophidae) of the Mediterranean flour moth, Ephestia kuehniella Zeller (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in Turkey. Egypt J Biol Pest Control 2019; 29: 78.
5
Pérez C. Sur une Coccidie nouvelle (Adelea mesnili n. sp.), parasite cœlomique d’un Lépidoptère. Bulletin de la Société entomologique de France 1899; 4: 275-7.
6
Steinhaus EA. A coccidian parasite of Ephestia kühniella Zeller and of Plodia interpunctella (Hbn) (Lepidoptera, Phycitidae). J Parasitol 1947; 33: 29-32.
7
Dales MJ. Controlling insect pests of stored products using insect growth regulators and insecticides of microbial origin. Nat Res Inst Bull 1994; 64: 1-58.
8
Kellen WR, Lindegren JE. Modes of transmission of Nosema plodiae Kellen and Lindegren, a pathogen of Plodia interpunctella (Hübner). J Stored Prod Res 1971; 7: 31-4.
9
Kellen WR, Lindegren JE. Transovarian transmission of Nosema plodiae in the Indian-meal moth, Plodia interpunctella. J Invertebr Pathol 1973; 21: 248-54.
10
Malone LA. Factors controlling in vitro hatching of Vairimorpha plodiae (Microspora) spores and their infectivity to Plodia interpunctella, Heliothis virescens, and Pieris brassicae. J Invertebr Pathol 1984; 44: 192-7.
11
Malone LA. A comparison of the development of Vairimorpha plodiae and Vairimorpha necatrix in the Indian meal moth, Plodia interpunctella. J Invertebr Pathol 1984; 43: 140-9.
12
Yaman M, Pınar Güngör F, Gonca Güner B, Radek R, Linde A. First report and spore ultrastructure of Vairimorpha plodiae (Opisthokonta: Microspora) from Plodia interpunctella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in Turkey. Acta Parasitol 2016; 61: 228-31.
13
Wendell EB, Dicke RJ. Detection by ultraviolet light of stored-product insects infected with Mattesia dispora. J Econ Entomol 1964; 57: 818-9.
14
Suzaki T, Uwo MF, Noda H, Takeda M. A new gregarine parasite of Plodia interpunctella (Insecta: Lepidoptera). Japanese J Protozool 2006; 39: 130-1.
15
Malone LA, Dhana S. Life cycle and ultrastructure of Adelina tenebrionis (Sporozoea: Adeleidae) from Heteronychus arator (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Parasitol Res 1988; 74: 201-7.
16
Léger L. Sur la presence d’une Coccidie coelomique chez Olocrates abbreviatus O1. Arch Zool Exp Gén Sér 1900; 3: 1-3.
17
Purrini K. Two new coccidian parasites of the genus Adelina (Adeleidae, Coccidia) parasitizing oribatid mite Nothrus silvestris (Oribatei, Acarina) and springtail Neanura muscorum (Collembola, Apterygota). Arch Protistenkd 1984; 128: 99-107.
18
Yarwood EA. The life cycle of Adelina cryptocerci sp. nov., a coccidian parasite of the roach Cryptocercus punctulatus. Parasitology 1937; 29: 370-90.
19
Levine ND. The protozoan phylum Apicomplexa, vol 1 and 2. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, p.357.
20
Weiser J, Beard RL. Adelina sericesthis n. sp., a new coccidian parasite of scarabaeid larvae. J Invertebr Pathol 1959; 1: 99-106.
21
Schneider A. Contribution à l’histoire des Grégarines des Invertébrés de Paris et de Roscof. Arch Zool Exp Gen 1875; 4: 493-604.
22
Sautet J. A propos d’Adelina tenebrionis, coccidie coelomique de Tenebrio molitor. Ann Parasitol Hum Comp 1930; 8: 582-9.
23
Léger L. Sporozoaires parasites de l’Embia solieri Rambur. Arch Protistenkd 1904; 3: 356-66.
24
Butaeva FG. Adelina grylli sp. nov. (Apicomplexa: Coccidia: Adeleidae) from Gryllus bimaculatus. Parazitologiya 1996; 30: 64-9.
25
Žižka Z. Ultrastructure of the sporozoite and the sporocyst wall of the coccidian species Adelina tribolii Bhatia, 1937 within the course of an autoinfection. Arch Protistenkd 1985; 129: 119-26.
26
Yaman M, Radek R. Characteristic Light and Electron Microscopic Features of Adelina melolonthae, a Coccidian Pathogen of the European Cockchafer, Melolontha melolontha (Coleoptera/Scarabaeidae). Acta Parasitol 2021; 66: 925-31.
2024 ©️ Galenos Publishing House