Cystic Echinococcosis in Pediatric Patients in Sivas Province: Clinical, Laboratory, Surgical, and Radiological Findings
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
Original Investigation
VOLUME: 50 ISSUE: 2
P: 72 - 77
June 2026

Cystic Echinococcosis in Pediatric Patients in Sivas Province: Clinical, Laboratory, Surgical, and Radiological Findings

Turkiye Parazitol Derg 2026;50(2):72-77
1. Sivas Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Microbiology, Sivas, Türkiye
2. Sivas Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pediatric Surgery, Sivas, Türkiye
No information available.
No information available
Received Date: 15.04.2025
Accepted Date: 18.03.2026
Online Date: 15.06.2026
Publish Date: 15.06.2026
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

ABSTRACT

Objective

This study aimed to retrospectively evaluate the serological, clinical, and radiological findings in the diagnosis of cystic echinococcosis (CE) in pediatric patients. The relationship between serological test results and clinical and radiological findings was also investigated.

Methods

The study included 216 pediatric patients (under 18 years old) who underwent indirect hemagglutination assay (IHA) testing for CE differential diagnosis between January 2016 and December 2023. Demographic data, clinical symptoms, radiological imaging results, and surgical status were obtained from the hospital information management system. IHA tests were performed using a commercial kit (Hydatidose, Fumouze Laboratoires, France) following the manufacturer’s protocol. A titer of ≥1/320 was considered positive, 1/160 as borderline, and <1/160 as negative. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 23.0, and a p-value <0.05 was considered significant.

Results

CE was diagnosed in 40 (18.5%) of 216 patients based on combined clinical, laboratory, and radiological evaluations. The mean age of the patients was 11.92±4.14 years, and 52.5% were male. IHA test results were positive in 31 (77.5%) patients and negative in 9 (22.5%). Radiological imaging showed a single cyst in 67.5% of patients and multicystic appearance in 32.5%. The most common cyst localizations were liver (67.5%), lung (22.5%), spleen (7.5%), and brain (2.5%). Surgery was performed in 42.5% of patients, while 22.5% were followed non-surgically. No statistically significant relationship was found between cyst number, localization, and IHA positivity (p>0.05).

Conclusion

The findings emphasize the importance of evaluating clinical, laboratory, and radiological data together for accurate and early diagnosis of CE. Due to the variable sensitivity of the IHA test, negative results should be confirmed with additional diagnostic methods. While radiological imaging provides critical information about cyst localization, further studies are needed to investigate the correlation between cyst number, localization, and clinical course. Larger patient series would help improve the diagnostic process and clinical management of pediatric CE.

Keywords:
Cystic echinococcosis, serological diagnosis, indirect hemagglutination, cyst hydatid

INTRODUCTION

Cystic echinococcosis is a zoonotic parasitic disease caused by Echinococcus species (1, 2). The parasite is transmitted to humans through ingestion of food or water contaminated with parasite eggs shed in the feces of infected dogs, or through direct contact with contaminated environments (3). Humans are intermediate hosts for Echinococcus, meaning they are not the parasite’s primary targets (4). In Türkiye, the disease is a significant public health issue, particularly in the Eastern and Central Anatolian regions and in rural areas (5). The liver is the most commonly affected organ, followed by the lungs. In pediatric cases, pulmonary involvement is more frequent than hepatic involvement (4). Due to the possibility of hematogenous spread, the parasite can affect various organs and, although rare, may localize in virtually any part of the body (5, 6).

The clinical presentation of the disease varies depending on factors such as the location, size, pressure effects, and possible rupture of the cyst. However, the disease may remain asymptomatic for many years (4, 7). A definitive diagnosis requires a combination of methods, including serology, histology, nucleic acid detection, and imaging techniques (3). Serological diagnosis is typically established using a screening test such as indirect hemagglutination assay (IHA) or ELISA, followed—if positive—by confirmation with Western blot testing (8). Treatment options for cystic echinococcosis include medical treatment, surgery, percutaneous interventions, and a watch-and-wait strategy, depending on the size, location, and clinical presentation of the cyst (4, 9).

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical findings, IHA results, surgical status, and radiological characteristics of patients diagnosed with cystic echinococcosis and to investigate the relationships among these variables.

METHODS

Study Design and Sample Collection

This study was approved by the Sivas Cumhuriyet University Ethics Committee with decision number 2024-12/06, dated December 19, 2024. A total of 216 samples from patients under 18 years of age, submitted between January 2016 and December 2023 from various departments of our hospital for the differential diagnosis of hydatid cyst, were retrospectively analyzed.

Clinical signs and symptoms, surgical status, radiological imaging findings, and demographic data of the patients were obtained from the hospital information management system. Repeated test results performed for treatment follow-up after an initial positive result were excluded from the study.

Serological Analysis

In the routine practice of our laboratory, sera were separated from blood samples and tested using a commercial kit (Hydatidose, Fumouze Laboratoires, France) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Upon arrival at the laboratory, the samples were stored at +4 °C and processed within 48 hours. The IHA was performed using U-bottom microplates.

Serum dilutions (1/80, 1/160, 1/320, and 1/640) were prepared and mixed with antigen-coated erythrocyte suspension. The absence of sedimentation or the presence of irregular lace-like sedimentation was considered a positive reaction. A negative result was defined as the formation of a compact button-like sediment in the center of the wells due to gravity.

According to the manufacturer’s instructions, titers of 1/320 and above were reported as positive. A titer of 1/160 was considered borderline, and repeat testing was recommended 2-3 weeks later.

Statistical Analysis

The collected data were analyzed using the SPSS version 23.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Categorical variables were presented as numbers and percentages. Descriptive statistics were expressed as mean ± standard deviation, minimum-maximum values, numbers, and percentages. Comparisons between categorical variables were performed using the Pearson chi-square test. When expected cell counts were less than five, Fisher’s exact test or Fisher-Freeman-Halton exact test was used as appropriate. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

In this study, cystic echinococcosis was identified in 40 patients based on laboratory, clinical, and radiological findings. Of these patients, 21 were male (52.5%) and 19 were female (47.5%), and the mean age was 11.92±4.14 years (range: 4-17). A positive IHA result (≥1/320) was detected in 31 patients (77.5%), while nine patients (22.5%) had negative IHA results (<1/320). Imaging modalities used for diagnosis included ultrasonography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging. A single cyst was observed in 27 patients (67.5%), whereas multiple cysts were present in 13 patients (32.5%).

Regarding cyst localization, the liver was the most commonly affected organ (67.5%), followed by the lungs (22.5%), spleen (7.5%), and brain (2.5%). Seventeen patients (42.5%) underwent surgical treatment, nine patients (22.5%) were followed without surgery, and the surgical status of 14 patients (35%) could not be determined.

At presentation, 34 patients (85%) had at least one symptom, whereas six patients (15%) were diagnosed incidentally during imaging studies performed for unrelated conditions. Abdominal pain was the most frequently reported symptom among patients with hepatic cysts, while cough was observed in patients with pulmonary involvement. No statistically significant association was found between cyst localization and presenting symptoms (p>0.200). Detailed demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients are presented in Table 1.

The distribution of IHA titers among patients was also evaluated. Five patients (12.5%) had titers below 1/160, four patients (10.0%) had a titer of 1/160, seven patients (17.5%) had a titer of 1/320, and twenty-four patients (60.0%) had titers of 1/640. Nine patients had negative IHA results. Despite negative serology, these patients were diagnosed with cystic echinococcosis based on compatible clinical findings and characteristic radiological features.

The relationship between cyst number and IHA positivity was also evaluated. IHA positivity was detected in 20 of 27 patients (74.1%) with a single cyst and in 11 of 13 patients (84.6%) with multiple cysts. No statistically significant association was found between cyst number and IHA positivity (Fisher’s exact test, p=0.690).

Regarding cyst localization, the liver was the most commonly affected organ (27/40, 67.5%), followed by the lungs (9/40, 22.5%), spleen (3/40, 7.5%), and brain (1/40, 2.5%). The distribution of cyst localization according to affected organs is illustrated in Figure 1. The association between cyst localization and IHA positivity was analyzed by grouping cyst localization as pulmonary, hepatic, and other sites. IHA positivity was observed in 7 of 8 patients (87.5%) with pulmonary cysts, 21 of 26 patients (80.8%) with hepatic cysts, and 3 of 6 patients (50.0%) with cysts located at other sites. No statistically significant association was found between cyst localization and IHA positivity (Pearson chi-square test, χ²=3.22, df=2, p=0.200) (Table 2).

Surgical management according to cyst localization was also evaluated. Surgical treatment was performed in patients with pulmonary, hepatic, and other organ involvements. However, no statistically significant association was found between cyst localization and surgical status (Fisher-Freeman-Halton exact test, p=0.413). The distribution of surgical status and presenting symptoms according to cyst localization is shown in Table 3. The location of the cyst and the most common associated symptoms are shown in Table 4.

DISCUSSION

Cystic echinococcosis remains an important zoonotic and public health problem in Türkiye, as reported by the Ministry of Health and several epidemiological studies (10, 11). Although infection may be acquired during childhood, the disease is often diagnosed later in life because hydatid cysts grow slowly. Previous studies have reported that only 10-20% of cases are diagnosed in individuals younger than 16 years (12). In the present study, 40 of 216 pediatric patients were diagnosed with cystic echinococcosis, indicating that the disease continues to represent a significant health concern in children and emphasizing the importance of early recognition and diagnosis.

In our study, no statistically significant difference in IHA positivity was observed between male and female patients. Similar findings have been reported in previous studies, suggesting that sex may not represent a major determinant of serological response in cystic echinococcosis (13, 14).

The reported localization sites in various studies are summarized in Table 5. In addition to hepatic and pulmonary involvement, splenic and cerebral hydatid cysts were also identified in our study. In several studies (15-19), the lungs have been reported as the most frequently involved organ in pediatric cases, whereas other studies have identified the liver as the most commonly affected organ, similar to adult populations (11, 16, 20, 21). In our study, the liver was the most frequently involved organ (67.5%), followed by the lungs (22.5%). The mean age of the patients in our study was 11.9 years. However, the age at diagnosis does not necessarily reflect the timing of infection or the onset of symptoms. The predominance of hepatic involvement observed in our study may be explained by the anatomical and physiological role of the liver as the first filter in the portal circulation, where parasites entering the bloodstream after intestinal absorption are most likely to be trapped.

In a study evaluating 57 pediatric hydatid cyst cases (20), abdominal pain was reported as the most common presenting complaint, followed by cough, nausea, vomiting, fever, and dyspnea. Another study analyzing 100 cases of hepatic hydatid cysts (30) found that fever, hepatomegaly, and abdominal pain were the most frequent symptoms. In pediatric patients with pulmonary involvement (19), cough, chest pain, and fever were reported as the predominant symptoms. Similarly, studies evaluating 38 pulmonary cystic echinococcosis cases (31), as well as other studies including 41 (16), 50 (15), and 376 (18) patients, have consistently reported cough, fever, and abdominal pain as the most common presenting complaints.

In the present study, the most frequent presenting symptom was abdominal pain, followed by cough and fever. Differences reported in the literature may be explained by variations in the localization of cyst involvement. Patients with hepatic cysts tend to present with abdominal pain, whereas pulmonary cysts are more commonly associated with cough. Although abdominal pain was more frequently observed among patients with hepatic cysts in our study, no statistically significant association was detected between cyst localization and presenting symptoms (p>0.05). This finding may be related to the relatively small sample size and suggests that clinical manifestations may overlap depending on multiple factors.

In line with our findings, varying rates of IHA positivity at the time of diagnosis have been reported in the literature, including 86.7% (18), 48% (32), 54.8% (16) and 58% (11). In our study, IHA positivity was 77.5%, and 15% of the patients were diagnosed incidentally during investigations performed for unrelated conditions. Although serological tests such as IHA are frequently used in the diagnostic evaluation of cystic echinococcosis, their sensitivity may vary depending on several factors. The host immune response may differ according to cyst location, stage, and integrity. In our study, some patients had negative IHA results despite radiologically compatible findings. Possible explanations for seronegativity include early-stage infection, intact cysts that do not induce a strong immune response, or variability in individual immune responses. Therefore, serological results should be interpreted together with clinical findings and imaging studies in the diagnostic evaluation of cystic echinococcosis.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this study highlight the importance of integrating clinical, serological, and imaging findings in the diagnostic evaluation of cystic echinococcosis in pediatric patients. Given the variable diagnostic sensitivity of the IHA, negative serological results should not exclude the disease, and further diagnostic evaluation may be required. Imaging modalities play a crucial role in identifying the localization of cysts and supporting the diagnostic process.

The relatively small sample size represents a limitation of the present study and may have influenced the statistical significance of some analyses. Nevertheless, the findings provide useful clinical and serological insights into pediatric cystic echinococcosis and emphasize the need for larger and prospective studies to better clarify the relationship between cyst characteristics and clinical manifestations.

Ethics

Ethics Committee Approval: This study was approved by the Sivas Cumhuriyet University Ethics Committee with decision number 2024-12/06, dated December 19, 2024.
Informed Consent: Retrospective study.

Authorship Contributions

Surgical and Medical Practices: L.C., Concept: K.F.T., L.C., M.H., Design: K.F.T., L.C., Data Collection or Processing: K.F.T., M.H., Analysis or Interpretation: K.F.T., L.C., M.H., Literature Search: K.F.T., Writing: K.F.T., L.C., M.H.
Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest was declared by the authors.
Financial Disclosure: The authors declared that this study received no financial support.

References

1
Tilkan OK, Uysal S, Gökçe M. Hidatik kist hastalığı [Hydatic cysys disease]. Med J West Black Sea. 2018; 2: 153-9. Turkish.
2
Tanır Başaranoğlu S, Kara A. Ekinokokkoz; kist hidatik [Echinococcosis, hydatid disease]. Klinik Tip Pediatri Derg. 2019; 6: 292-7. Turkish.
3
Badwaik N, Gharde P, Shinde RK, Tayade H, Navandhar PS, Patil M. Hydatid cyst or echinococcosis: a comprehensive review of transmission, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and multidisciplinary treatment. Cureus. 2024; 16: e63713.
4
Parlak E. Echinococcosis. Mediterr J Infect Microb Antimicrob. 2021; 10: 47.
5
Vurucu S, Yüksel C, Akça A, Önder T, Güçlü Kayta SB, Alkan S. Kist hidatik hastalığınının intratorasik ve pulmoner tutulumları [Intrathoracic and pulmonary involvements of hydatid cyst disease]. Phoenix Med J. 2022; 4: 102-4. Turkish.
6
Aydin Y, Ulas AB, Ahmed AG, Eroglu A. Pulmonary hydatid cyst in children and adults: diagnosis and management. Eurasian J Med. 2022; 54(Suppl1): 133-40.
7
Sayek I, Tirnaksiz MB, Dogan R. Cystic hydatid disease: current trends in diagnosis and management. Surg Today. 2004; 34: 987-96.
8
T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı Halk Sağlığı Genel Müdürlüğü. Ulusal Mikrobiyoloji Standartları: Bulaşıcı Hastalıklar Laboratuvar Tanı Rehberi. Cilt 3. Ankara: T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı Halk Sağlığı Genel Müdürlüğü; 2015. Available from: https://hsgm.saglik.gov.tr/depo/birimler/mikrobiyoloji-referans-laboratuvarlari-ve-biyolojik-urunler-db/Dokumanlar/Rehberler/UMS_LabTaniRehberi_Cilt_1.pdf
9
From the American Association of Neurological Surgeons (AANS), American Society of Neuroradiology (ASNR), Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology Society of Europe (CIRSE), Canadian Interventional Radiology Association (CIRA), Congress of Neurological Surgeons (CNS), European Society of Minimally Invasive Neurological Therapy (ESMINT), European Society of Neuroradiology (ESNR), European Stroke Organization (ESO), Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI), Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR), Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery (SNIS), and World Stroke Organization (WSO); Sacks D, Baxter B, Campbell BCV, Carpenter JS, Cognard C, Dippel D, et al. Multisociety consensus quality improvement revised consensus statement for endovascular therapy of acute ischemic stroke. Int J Stroke. 2018; 13: 612-32.
10
Altıntaş N, Topluoğlu S, Yıldırım A, Uslu H, Ekşi F, Ok Ü, et al. Current situation report of cystic echinococcosis in Turkey. Turk Hij Den Biyol Derg. 2020; 77: 1-52.
11
Kaman A, Tanır G, Çakmakçı E, Demir P, Öz FN, Teke TA, et al. Characteristics, diagnosis, and treatment modality of pediatric patients with cystic echinococcosis: a single centre experience. Turk J Pediatr. 2019; 61: 704-13.
12
Moro P, Schantz PM. Echinococcosis: a review. Int J Infect Dis. 2009; 13: 125-33.
13
Doğan N, İlhan D, Alkan A. ESOGÜ Tıp fakültesi hastanesi mikrobiyoloji laboratuvarına gönderilen kist hidatik ön tanılı hasta örneklerinin; yaş, cinsiyet ve gönderilen bölümlere göre on yıllık laboratuvar sonuçlarının gözden geçirilmesi [The evaluation of ten-year laboratory results of cyst hydatid pre-diagnosed patient samples analyzed in microbiology laboratory of ESOGÜ medical faculty hospital by age, gender and relevant departments]. Turk Tip Ogr Arast Derg. 2020; 2: 119-25. Turkish.
14
Demirci E, Altun E, Çalık M, Durur Subaşı I, Şipal S, Gündoğdu ÖB. Farklı lokalizasyonları ile kist hidatik olguları: Erzurum bölgesi [Hydatid cyst cases with different localization: region of Erzurum]. Turkiye Parazitol Derg. 2015; 39: 103-7. Turkish.
15
Eyüboğlu TŞ, Gürsoy TR, Aslan AT, Pekcan S, Budakoğlu Iİ. Ten-year follow-up of children with hydatid cysts. Turk Pediatri Ars. 2019; 54: 173-8.
16
Çakır D, Çelebi S, Gürpınar A, Ağın M, Bozdemir ŞE. Kist hidatikli olguların değerlendirilmesi [Evaluation of cases with hydatid diseases]. J Pediatr Inf. 2009; 3: 104-8. Turkish.
17
Uluşan A, Hengirmen MA, Şanlı M, Işık AF. 16 yaş altı çocuklarda akciğer hidatik kist cerrahisi: vaka serisi [Lung hydatid cyst surgery in children under 16: case series]. Dicle Tip Derg. 2020; 47: 138-45. Turkish.
18
Anadol D, Göçmen A, Kiper N, Ozçelik U. Hydatid disease in childhood: a retrospective analysis of 376 cases. Pediatr Pulmonol. 1998; 26: 190-6.
19
Erol M, Yiğit Ö, Toksöz M, Gayret ÖB, Özaydın S, Akova F, et al. Akciğer semptomları ile bulgu veren kist hidatikli olgularımızın değerlendirilmesi [Evaluation of cases with hydatid cyst who presented with pulmonary symptoms]. Haseki Tip Bul. 2015; 53: 147-52. Turkish.
20
Tüz AE, Ekemen Keleş Y, Şahin A, Üstündağ G, Taşar S, Karadağ Öncel E, et al. Hydatid disease in children from diagnosis to treatment: a 10-year single center experience. Turkiye Parazitol Derg. 2022; 46: 189-94.
21
Ok ÜZ, Kilimcioğlu AA, Özkol M. Türkiye’de insanlarda kistik ekinokokkoz [Cystic echinococcosis in humans in Turkey]. Mikrobiyol Bul. 2020; 54: 510-22. Turkish.
22
Mansour M, Nassar K, Masri M, Kanas M, Aldrea F, et al. A massive primary hydatid splenic cyst was successfully managed through open total splenectomy: a case report and review article. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2023; 85: 5208-13.
23
Zorluoğlu A, İmamoğlu Ş, Tıkız N, Kutlay B, Kızıl A. Tiroid bezinde kist hidatik (olgu bildirimi) [Hydatid disease of the thyroid gland (case report)]. Uludag Univ Tip Fak Derg. 1987; 14: 397-9. Turkish.
24
Arac S, Karaca C, Oztekin H, Topal H. Cyst hydatid of pelvis-subtotal resection of the pelvic girdle. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica. 2006; 22: 150-2.
25
Yeşil C, Caylan AE, İnan D. Nefrektomi sonrası tanı almış izole renal kist hidatik olgu sunumu [Isolated renal hydatid cyst case report diagnosed after nephrectomy]. Akdeniz Med J. 2024; 10: 177-80. Turkish.
26
Çelebi Çongur E, Bayramoğlu Z, Özçelik G, Sözeri B, Kardaş AN, Şahin A, et al. Diagnostic challenges during pandemic: a case report. J Pediatr Inf. 2022; 16: e111-4.
27
Mutlu İ, Koyuncu ÖR, Çakır Y. Multiple cerebral hydatic cyst developed after operation of cardiac hydatic cyst: a case report. Turkiye Parazitol Derg. 2024; 48: 62-5.
28
Assamadi M, Benantar L, Hamadi H, Ksiks O, El Hadwe S, Aniba K. Cerebral hydatid cyst in children: a case series of 21 patients and review of literature. Neurochirurgie. 2022; 68: 618-26.
29
Mohammed AA, Arif SH. Hydatid cyst of the ovary - a very rare type of cystic ovarian lesion: a case report. Case Rep Womens Health. 2021; 31: e00330.
30
Mirshemirani A, Khaleghnejad A, Kouranloo J, Sadeghian N, Rouzrokh M, Hasas-Yeganeh S. Liver hydatid cyst in children (a 14-year review). Iran J Pediatr. 2011; 21: 385-9.
31
İncekara F, Türk İ, Kutlay C, Aydoğdu K, Demiröz ŞM, Kaya S, et al. Onaltı yaş altı olgularda kist hidatik hastaliği radyolojik bulgulari ve cerrahi yaklaşım [Surgical treatment and radiological findings of hydatid cyst in patients under 16 years of age]. Ankara Egit Arast Hast Tip Derg. 2021; 54: 238-42.
32
Öztaş D, Ekşi F, Karslıgil T. Kistik ekinokokkoz şüpheli hastaların tanısında indirekt hemaglütinasyon ve immünokromatografik yöntemin karşılaştırılması [The comparison of indirect hemagglutination and immunochromatographic methods in diagnosis of patients with cystic echinococcosis doubt]. Turk Mikrobiyol Cemiy Derg. 2023; 53: 258-64. Turkish.