Prevalence of Ecto and Gastrointestinal Parasites of <i>Rattus rattus</i> in Mazandaran Province, North of Iran
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
Original Investigation
P: 53-58
March 2023

Prevalence of Ecto and Gastrointestinal Parasites of Rattus rattus in Mazandaran Province, North of Iran

Turkiye Parazitol Derg 2023;47(1):53-58
1. Toxoplasmosis Research Center, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran
2. Department of Parasitology, Sari Medical School, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran
3. Infectious Diseases Research Center, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran
4. Shahroud University of Medical Sciences Faculty of Medicine, Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Shahroud, Iran
5. Islamic Azad University of Chalous Branch, Chalous, Iran
No information available.
No information available
Received Date: 08.05.2022
Accepted Date: 29.11.2022
Publish Date: 02.03.2023
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

ABSTRACT

Objective:

Rodents act as reservoir hosts and are an important potential source for many zoonotic pathogens such as parasites, which pose a public health risk to humans. Therefore, it is necessary to investigate the prevalence of parasites among rodents.

Methods:

A total of 118 Rattus rattus were captured in Mazandaran province, north of Iran, using snap live traps. Various samples were collected from feces and each rat was combed with a fine-tooth comb to extricate any ectoparasite. Fecal specimens were examined by direct wet mounting, formalin-ether concentration, modified acid-fast, and trichrome staining methods.

Results:

The overall prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites in the examined rats was 75.4%. Cryptosporidium spp. (30.5%) were the most prevalent protozoan, followed by Giardia spp. (20.3%), Entamoeba muris (13.5%), Trichomonas muris (10.1%), and Spironucleus muris (3.3%). Regarding helminths’ eggs, Syphacia obvelata (24.5%), Hymenolepis diminuta (10.1%), and Trichuris muris (9.3%) had the highest prevalence, respectively. Furthermore, 3060 ectoparasites collected from 102 rodents were infested with lice (40% Polyplax spp.), mites (33.3%), and flea (16.1% Xenopsylla cheopis and 10.6% Xenopsylla astia).

Conclusion:

According to the results of this study, the prevalence of ecto and gastrointestinal parasites in the collected rats in the area being studied was remarkably high. Additionally, Rattus rattus can be considered a potential risk to human health.

Keywords: Prevalence, rodent, gastrointestinal parasites, ectoparasites, Iran

INTRODUCTION

Rodents are known to be reservoir hosts for at least 60 zoonotic diseases and play an important role in disease transmission, especially where these animals are in close association with human settlements (1). Rodents comprise nearly two-thirds of the world’s mammal species identified and are prosperous in biological adapting to various situations (2,3). They live in various geographical areas, including sewage channels, slaughterhouses, waste disposal sites, farms, and food storage places. These animals are mostly small in size and reproduce very quickly. Over thousands of years, the presence of rodents, particularly murine, in the human environment has been considered a pest in the agricultural and urban environments causing economic losses. They act as reservoir hosts and an important potential source for many zoonotic pathogens that pose a health risk for humans and induce significant socioeconomic problems (4,5). Rats can transmit infective agent through bite, urine, feces, and ectoparasites (6,7). Parasitic zoonoses, such as Cryptosporidium spp., Giardia spp., Toxoplasma gondii, Entamoeba histolytica, Syphacia obvelata, and Hymenolepis diminuta infect enormous numbers of humans and are responsible for huge morbidity and mortality around the world. Murine ectoparasites, such as fleas, lice, and ticks can usually live in close association with different types of rodents (8,9). Some of the ectoparasites are vectors of important pathogenic microorganisms, and some others directly cause itching, ulcerated skin, hair loss, skin abrasion, and asthma (6). They can also be serious infectious agents for several parasitic zoonoses, plague, leptospirosis, rat-bite fever, Omsk hemorrhagic fever, and murine typhus (10).

Although rats are widely distributed in Mazandaran province, north of Iran, there is no data on the prevalence of ecto and gastrointestinal parasites in these animals (11). Concerning the public health risks of rats, for the first time, this study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of ecto and gastrointestinal parasites in rats in Sari, Iran.

METHODS

Ethical Approval

The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Research Ethics Committee of the Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Iran (approval number: 875).

Geographical Information on the Study Area

Sari is the provincial capital of Mazandaran, located in the north of Iran, between the slopes of the Alborz Mountains and the southern coast of the Caspian Sea (Figure 1). Its coordinates are: 36°3348N 53°0336E, and its population is 453,782 people. Sari has a hot-summer Mediterranean climate. Winters are cool and rainy, whilst summers are hot and humid. This city has a particular geographical condition, including many plains, prairies, and forests. There are broad agricultural areas, barns, and crop fields. These conditions provide proper climatic conditions and habitats for the breeding rodents.

Figure 1

Sample Collection

Using live traps, a total of 118 Rattus rattus were captured from different sites in Sari from January 2020 to February 2021. The rats were transferred to the Parasitology Laboratory of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences. For each captured rat, sex, morphometric measurements, trapping location, and weight were recorded. Also, the animals were classified into juveniles (≤2 months old) and adults (≥2 months old) according to their body weight (borderline value: 200 gr).

Rodent Identification

Keys and illustrations developed by Harrison & Quah (1962) and Medway (1983) were used to recognize rodent species by morphological measurements and physical appearances.

Sample Examination

Rats were dissected following the protocol previously described (12). Fecal samples from gastrointestinal tracts were examined by direct wet mounting with saline and iodine. A saline wet smear was made by mixing almost 2 mg of stool with a drop of saline on a glass microscope slide. Likewise, the iodine wet mount was ready by adding nearly 2 mg of stool to a drop of Lugol’s iodine on a glass microscope slide, and a cover slip was inserted on the stool suspension. Primarily, these wet smears were studied using a low-power (10×) objective and then by a high-power (40×) objective of a light microscope. In addition, for more accurate diagnosis of protozoa cysts, trophozoites, and worm eggs, a piece of fecal samples used for performing the formalin-ether concentration technique (FECT) and trichrome staining (13).

Cryptosporidium Oocyst Detection

All stool samples from the intestines were studied for the parasite oocysts, including Cryptosporidium spp. which were identified by microscopy after sugar flotation and modified acid-fast staining (14).

Examination for Ectoparasites

Each rodent was combed with a fine-tooth comb to extricate any ectoparasite into a tray. Fine forceps were used to pick up ticks and mites from rodents’ skin when it was hard to extricate them by combing. Bags, where rodents hold, were overturned to the tray to gather extricated ectoparasites. The tray contents were scrutinized with a hand lens, and ectoparasites were collected using the moistened applicator stick and placed in a collection tube comprising 70% alcohol. A distinct container was used for each rodent (2). Ectoparasites were identified by valid entomological keys (15,16).

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) version 20. Univariate Fisher’s Exact test and chi-square analysis was used to determine the association between the prevalence of parasites and host factors (age, gender, and area). A p-value <0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

In the current study, we included 118 rats (average weight: 250 gr). It is noteworthy that 60.2% and 39.8% of rats were trapped in urban and rural areas, respectively. The rats (67 male vs 51 female) were categorized according to their age into two groups’ juveniles (27 or 22.88%) and adults (91 or 77.12%). The prevalence of parasitic infection was higher among males (83.5%) than females (64.7%). However, there was no significant difference between prevalence of parasitic infection and gender (p<0/05). Out of 118 samples, 89 (75.4%) were positive for intestinal parasites. The prevalence rates for intestinal protozoa and helminths were 80.5% and 44.02%, respectively. Tables 1, 2 show the prevalence of gastrointestinal and ectoparasites in collected rats based on sex, age, and habitat. Also, Table 3 shows the prevalence of isolated gastrointestinal parasites in rats.

Table 1
Table 2
Table 3

Out of 118 samples, 86.4% were positive for ectoparasites, and 69.4% both ectoparasite infestation and endo-parasite infection. A total of 3060 ectoparasites collected from 102 rodents. They were infested with lice (40% Polyplax spp.), mite (33.3%), and flea (16.1% Xenopsylla cheopis and 10.6% Xenopsylla astia). Table 4 indicates the prevalence of ectoparasite infestation among the examined rats in Sari. Moreover, mixed infections were present in some rats.

Table 4

DISCUSSION

Our study demonstrated a high prevalence of intestinal parasite infection (75.4%) and ectoparasite infestation (86.4%) in the examined samples. Intestinal parasites prevalence in the present study was significantly higher than the results from Iranshahr and Nikshahr districts in Sistan and Baluchistan province, southeastern Iran (47%) (17). However, it was similar to the reports from Ardabil province located in northwestern Iran (74%) (4), Belgrade area in Serbia (68.5%) (18), and Nile rat in rural and urban regions of Sudan (70%) (19).

Our data clearly demonstrate that there was no significant difference between prevalence of ecto and gastrointestinal parasites and gender. However, it was higher among male than female rats; this might be attributed to the fact that infected males have greater territories than uninfected males, which could increase their exposure to infection (20). In addition, the higher prevalence of infection among male rats may be explained by the fact that larger bodies of males are easier targets for parasites (18).

According to our results, the prevalence of ecto and gastrointestinal parasites in adults’ rats was slightly higher than juveniles’ rats. An acceptable justification may be that adults have more exposure time than juveniles due to their age. In this study, Cryptosporidium spp. was the most prevalent protozoan (30.5%) observed in the examined rodents. These findings were in agreement with the results of the previous study, which reported Cryptosporidium species in rats from Poland (68.1%), the Philippines (28.5%), and Australia (8.2%) (21-23). This protozoan was also found in the wild, laboratory, and pet rodents in China (11.5%) and Japan (27%) (14,24). Rodents are naturally infected with zoonotic Cryptosporidium spp. These animals have been considered potential reservoirs of Cryptosporidiosis in humans and farm animals because they are frequently found in agricultural areas and have opportunities to contact other animals and humans (25).

In the current study, the prevalence of Giardia spp. among rats was considerable (20.3%). In other studies, the prevalence of Giardia spp. was reported as 27% in Iran (11), 38.4% in southwestern Poland (21), 65.9% in Pennsylvania, the united states (26), and 48.3% in the Mazury Lake District region of Poland (27). Giardiasis is an intestinal infection with the protozoan flagellate parasite Giardia spp., which causes major public and veterinary health concerns. Giardiasis has variable clinical symptoms ranging from asymptomatic to acute or chronic diarrhea, dehydration, nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramps, disaccharide, intolerance weight loss, and malabsorption (28).

Spironucleus muris is another protozoan parasite observed in 3.3% of the examined samples. Although S. muris has been isolated from a few infected individuals, it is usually considered non-pathogenic for humans. However, in our study, its prevalence was lower than in the previous study conducted on laboratory mice in Iran (64.86%) (11). In addition, examining the gastrointestinal content of rodents showed infection with two nematoda and one cestode, but the infection was distinguished only by the presence of the eggs. The prevalence of Syphacia obvelata, a murine pinworm species, was 25.1% among rats examined in this study. S. obvelata can cause disease in humans (17). This parasite was reported among rats in South Korea (21.7%) (29) and in laboratory mice from Iran (48.6%) (11). In this study, Hymenolepis diminuta, also known as rat tapeworm, was detected in 10.1% of samples. Other researchers also reported this parasite among rats in southeastern Iran (23.4%) (17), Dashte-Mogan, Ardabil province, Iran (38.8%) (4), Belgrade, Serbia (30.5%) (18), and Baltimore, the United States (34.4%) (30). Man acquires the infection via ingestion of infected intermediate host (rat’s flea). Although its mild infection is usually asymptomatic, severe infection may cause headache, dizziness, pruritis, diarrhea or occasionally cachexia in humans. In this study, the prevalence of Trichuris muris was 9.3%. The whipworm Trichuris muris (family: Trichuridae) is a gastrointestinal nematode parasite of house mice and rats (18). This parasite has also been reported among rats in different parts of the world (4,18,30).

Ectoparasites play an essential role in the spread of disease to humans and animals. For instance, fleas are important vectors to plague and murine typhus in many parts of the world, ticks are important due to their role in CCHF (Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever), theileriosis, babesiosis, anaplasmosis, and ehrlichiosis transmission, and lice are important for epidemic typhus or exanthamaticus thyphus transmission. In the present study, 3060 ectoparasites collected from 102 rodents were infested with lice (40% Polyplax spp.), mite (33.3%), and flea (16.1% Xenopsylla cheopis and 10.6% Xenopsylla astia). In a study in the Baluchistan area, southeast of Iran, 67 individual rodents from four species of gerbil and jird (Tatera indica (55.2%), Meriones hurrianae (37.3%), Gerbillus nanus (4.5%), and Meriones libycus (3%) were captured from 2008 to 2009. Out of 1,276 ectoparasites, 299 were related to mites, 127 to fleas, 972 to lice, and 24 to ticks (6). In another study which presented ectoparasites for four species of rodents Rattus rattus palelae, R. argentiventer, R. exulans, and Mus musculus castaneus in Sulawesi Utara, Indonesia, Xenopsylla cheopis flea was the most common in R. rattus (31).

Data from some studies have showed that the overall prevalence of flea infestation was higher than that of lice or mite. For instance, in a study in Bandar Abbas, southern Iran, ectoparasites were collected from 77 rodents (including R. rattus, R. norvegicus, Mus musculus, and hamster) and the rate of fleas isolated from rats was 87% (32). In a similar study conducted by El Kady et al. (33) in Egypt, among 135 captured rats (including R. norvegicus, R. rattus frugivorous, R. rattus alexandrines and Mus musculus), fleas were observed more prevalent than other ectoparasites.

CONCLUSION

According to the findings of this study, monitoring rodent populations and their ectoparasite infestation is essential for preparedness and early warning preparation for possible control of zoonotic arthropod-borne diseases. In our study, the prevalence of gastrointestinal and ectoparasites was remarkably high in the collected rats in the studied area. In addition, R. rattus can be considered a potential risk to human health due to collected gastrointestinal and ectoparasites. Therefore, controlling these animals in the study area is of particular importance. The results of the present study can provide information to the authorities for the prevention and control of rodent-borne diseases in the region. Further studies are required due to the considerable unexplored area of this province to increase knowledge on endo-parasites and ectoparasites in rats and potential zoonosis and veterinary diseases.

The authors sincerely thank all the people who contributed to this study.

Ethics Committee Approval: The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Research Ethics Committee of the Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Iran (ethics code: 875).

Informed Consent: Not required.

Peer-review: Internally peer-reviewed.

Concept: A.D., F.R., Design: F.R., Data Collection or Processing: F.R., A.A., A.S.P., S.S., Analysis or Interpretation: M.S., M.T.R., Literature Search: F.R., M.T.R., A.S.P., Writing: F.R., A.D., S.S.

Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest was declared by the authors.

Financial Disclosure: This research was financially supported by the Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran (no. 875).

References

1
Hosseini SA, Abediankenari S, Amouei A, Sarvi S, Sharif M, Rezaei F, et al. Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in Wild Rats (Rattus rattus) in Northern Iran. Vet Med Int 2021; 2021: 6655696.
2
Paramasvaran S, Sani R, Hassan L, Krishnasamy M, Jeffery J, Oothuman P, et al. Ectoparasite fauna of rodents and shrews from four habitats in Kuala Lumpur and the states of Selangor and Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia and its public health significance. Trop Biomed 2009; 26: 303-11.
3
Shafiyyah CS, Jamaiah I, Rohela M, Lau Y, Aminah FS. Prevalence of intestinal and blood parasites among wild rats in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Trop Biomed 2012; 29: 544-50.
4
Kia E, Shahryary-Rad E, Mohebali M, Mahmoudi M, Mobedi I, Zahabiun F, et al. Endoparasites of rodents and their zoonotic importance in Germi, Dashte–Mogan, Ardabil Province, Iran. Iran J Parasitol 2010; 5: 15-20.
5
Pazoki H, Ziaee M, Anvari D, Rezaei F, Ahmadpour E, Haghparast-Kenari B, et al. Toxoplasma gondii infection as a potential risk for chronic liver diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Microb Pathog 2020; 149: 104578.
6
Nateghpour M, Akhavan A, Hanafi-Bojd A, Telmadarraiy Z, Mavi AS, Hosseini-Vasoukolaei N, et al. Wild rodents and their ectoparasites in Baluchistan area, southeast of Iran. Trop Biomed 2013; 30: 72-7.
7
Antoniou M, Psaroulaki A, Toumazos P, Mazeris A, Ioannou I, Papaprodromou M, et al. Rats as indicators of the presence and dispersal of pathogens in Cyprus: ectoparasites, parasitic helminths, enteric bacteria, and encephalomyocarditis virus. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis 2010; 10: 867-73.
8
Soliman S, Main AJ, Marzouk AS, Montasser AA. Seasonal studies on commensal rats and their ectoparasites in a rural area of Egypt: the relationship of ectoparasites to the species, locality, and relative abundance of the host. J Parasitol 2001; 87: 545-53.
9
Daryani A, Ebrahimzadeh MA, Sharif M, Rezaei F, Ahmadpour E, Sarvi S, et al. The inhibitory effect of ketotifen on entrance of Toxoplasma gondii tachyzoites into macrophages of mouse. J Mazand Uni Med Sci 2014; 23: 75-80.
10
Stojcevic D, Mihaljevic Z, Marinculic A. Parasitological survey of rats in rural regions of Croatia. Vet Med 2004; 49: 70-4.
11
Kalani H, Daryani A, Fakhar M, Sharif M, Faridnia R. A survey on intestinal parasites in Swiss Webster mice. J Mazand Uni Med Sci 2013; 22: 64-9.
12
Herbreteau V, Jittapalapong S, Rerkamnuaychoke W, Chaval Y, Cosson JF, Morand S. Protocols for Field and Laboratory Rodent Studies. Kasetsart University; 2011.p.5-46.
13
Youssefi MR, Mousapour A, Nikzad R, Gonzalez-Solis D, Halajian A, Rahimi MT. Gastrointestinal helminths of the Caspian turtle, Mauremys caspica (Testudines), from Northern Iran. J Parasit Dis 2016; 40: 65-8.
14
Lv C, Zhang L, Wang R, Jian F, Zhang S, Ning C, Wang H, et al. Cryptosporidium spp. in wild, laboratory, and pet rodents in China: prevalence and molecular characterization. Appl Environ Microbiol 2009; 75: 7692-9.
15
Asmar M, Piazak N, Karimi Y. Fleas, identification keys of fleas of Iran and introduction-hosts-geografic distribution. Pastor Institute of Iran; 1979.p.25-54.
16
Wall RL, Shearer D. Veterinary ectoparasites: biology, pathology and control. 3nd ed. St. Malden: Blackwell Science, John Wiley & Sons; 2008.p.23-178.
17
Nateghpour M, Motevalli-Haghi A, Akbarzadeh K, Akhavan AA, Mohebali M, Mobedi I, et al. Endoparasites of wild rodents in southeastern Iran. J Arthropod Borne Dis 2015; 9: 1-6.
18
Kataranovski M, Mirkov I, Belij S, Popov A, Petrović Z, Gačić Z, et al. Intestinal helminths infection of rats (Ratus norvegicus) in the Belgrade area (Serbia): the effect of sex, age and habitat. Parasite 2011; 18: 189-96.
19
Fagir DM, El‐Rayah EA. Parasites of the Nile rat in rural and urban regions of Sudan. Integr Zool 2009; 4: 179-87.
20
Brown E, Macdonald D, Tew T, Todd I. Rhythmicity of egg production by Heligmosomoides polygyrus in wild wood mice, Apodemus sylvaticus. J Helminthol 1994; 68: 105-8.
21
Perec-Matysiak A, Buńkowska-Gawlik K, Zaleśny G, Hildebrand J. Small rodents as reservoirs of Cryptosporidium spp. and Giardia spp. in south-western Poland. Ann Agric Environ Med 2015; 22: 1-5.
22
Ng-Hublin JS, Singleton GR, Ryan U. Molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium spp. from wild rats and mice from rural communities in the Philippines. Infect Genet Evol 2013; 16: 5-12.
23
Paparini A, Jackson B, Ward S, Young S, Ryan UM. Multiple Cryptosporidium genotypes detected in wild black rats (Rattus rattus) from northern Australia. Exp Parasitol 2012; 131: 404-12.
24
Kimura A, Edagawa A, Okada K, Takimoto A, Yonesho S, Karanis P. Detection and genotyping of Cryptosporidium from brown rats (Rattus norvegicus) captured in an urban area of Japan. Parasitol Res 2007; 100: 1417-20.
25
Murakoshi F, Fukuda Y, Matsubara R, Kato Y, Sato R, Sasaki T, et al. Detection and genotyping of Cryptosporidium spp. in large Japanese field mice, Apodemus speciosus. Vet Parasitol 2013; 196: 184-8.
26
Bitto A, Aldras A. Prevalence of Giardia and Cryptosporidium in muskrats in northeastern Pennsylvania and New Jersey. J Environ Health 2009; 71: 20-8.
27
Bajer A, Bednarska M, Pawełczyk A, Behnke JM, Gilbert FS, Sinski E. Prevalence and abundance of Cryptosporidium parvum and Giardia spp. in wild rural rodents from the Mazury Lake District region of Poland. Parasitology 2002; 125: 21-34.
28
Bajer A, Behnke JM, Bednarska M, Kuliś K, Siński E. [The co-occurence of Cryptosporidium parvum, Giardia spp. and helminth infections in small rodent populations]. Wiad Parazytol 2004; 50: 307-15.
29
Kim DG, Park JH, Kim JL, Jung BK, Jeon SJ, Lim H, et al. Intestinal nematodes from small mammals captured near the demilitarized zone, Gyeonggi province, Republic of Korea. Korean J Parasitol 2015; 53: 135-9.
30
Easterbrook JD, Kaplan J, Glass G, Watson J, Klein S. A survey of rodent-borne pathogens carried by wild-caught Norway rats: a potential threat to laboratory rodent colonies. Lab Anim 2008; 42: 92-8.
31
Durden LA, Page BF. Ectoparasites of commensal rodents in Sulawesi Utara, Indonesia, with notes on species of medical importance. Med Vet Entomol 1991; 5: 1-7.
32
Kia E, Moghddas-Sani H, Hassanpoor H, Vatandoost H, Zahabiun F, Akhavan A, et al. Ectoparasites of rodents captured in Bandar Abbas, southern Iran. Iran J Arthropod Borne Dis 2009; 3: 44-9.
33
El Kady GA, El Shazly AM, Mikhail MW, Bahgat IM. Ectoparasites of commensal rodents in Talkha Center, Dakahlia Governorate, Egypt. J Egypt Soc Parasitol 2007; 37: 825-33.
2024 ©️ Galenos Publishing House