<i>Wolbachia</i> spp. and <i>Spiroplasma</i> spp. in <i>Musca</i> spp.: Detection Using Molecular Approaches
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
Original Investigation
P: 211-215
September 2021

Wolbachia spp. and Spiroplasma spp. in Musca spp.: Detection Using Molecular Approaches

Turkiye Parazitol Derg 2021;45(3):211-215
1. Niğde Ömer Halisdemir University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Department of Biotechnology, Niğde, Turkey
2. Yale University, School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
3. Niğde Ömer Halisdemir University, Bor Vocational School, Bor-Niğde, Turkey
No information available.
No information available
Received Date: 01.02.2021
Accepted Date: 18.05.2021
Publish Date: 04.08.2021
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

ABSTRACT

Objective:

This study aimed to detect the presence of Wolbachia and Spiroplasma endosymbionts in Musca flies through molecular approaches.

Methods:

In total, 40 Musca spp. (20 female and 20 male) were used. Before DNA extraction, the flies were dissected and their heads, wings and legs were detached from their bodies under a stereomicroscope. Genomic DNA was analysed by standard polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using primers against Musca beta-tubulin. Afterward, the samples were examined for the presence of Wolbachia spp. using primers against Wolbachia wsp and GroEL. Furthermore, the DNA samples were analysed by PCR to detect the presence of Spiroplasma using primers against the 16S rRNA.

Results:

No Wolbachia positivity was detected in Musca flies, as shown by the negative PCR results for wsp and GroEL. Spiroplasma positivity was detected in 5% (1/20) of the female Musca flies but not in the male flies (0/20).

Conclusion:

Wolbachia spp. were not detected in Musca flies. Of the total Musca flies, only one was positive for Spiroplasma spp. To our knowledge, this is the first study to detect the presence of Spiroplasma in Musca flies.

Keywords: Musca, Wolbachia, Spiroplasma, PCR

INTRODUCTION

Many insects harbour heritable endosymbiotic bacteria. The majority of heritable endosymbionts are facultative. Several recent studies have shown that facultative endosymbionts can offer their hosts with resistance to parasites (1-3).

Wolbachia species are maternally inherited intracellular symbiont belong to the alfa-proteobacteria that infect many arthropods and nematodes. Recent surveys indicated that around 76% of all insect species may be infected with Wolbachia (4-6). Wolbachia is responsible for inducing a number of reproductive modifications that enable its spread and maintenance in natural arthropod populations. For these reasons, there is a growing interest in the potential application of Wolbachia in biocontrol programs. Findings of the study indicated that Wolbachia infections limit parasite proliferation in the insect host and this situation provides the control of disease transmission (7,8).

One of the most spread and widely studied endosymbionts is Spiroplasma and is likely to be present in over 5% of all insect species (9,10). The genus Spiroplasma contains a group of motile, helical, without cell walls procaryotes that are associated primarily with insects (11). Spiroplasma endosymbionts are mainly found in haemolymph extracellulary and maternally transmitted (10,12,13). Some strains of Spiroplasma can cause female-biased sex rations through selective death of male off spring in their insect host (10-12).

The main purpose of present study is to investigate the presence of Wolbachia and Spiroplasma endosymbionts in Musca flies in Niğde province in Turkey by using molecular tools.

METHODS

This research was performed in Musca species of Niğde province, in Central Anatolia of Turkey (with an altitude of 1.240 m, 37° 58´ N longitude-34° 41´ E latitude). The climate in Niğde province is subtropical continental with the annual average temperature about 11 °C. A total of 40 Musca species (20 female and 20 male) were used in this study. Before DNA extraction, flies were dissected and removed their head, wings and legs under a stereo-microscope. Genomic DNA was isolated using DNeasy® Blood and Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Valencia CA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Concentration of extracted DNA was detected using a Nanodrop 2.000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, MA, USA) and keep at -20 °C until analysed.

Genomic DNAs were tested by standard polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification using primers against Musca beta-tubulin (forward primer 5´ TCT GCC GTC GTA ACT TGG AC 3´and reverse primer 5´ CAC CTT CAC CAT CAC CGG AA 3´, product size 700 bp). PCRs were performed in a total volume of 25 µl using 1 µl of DNA template and GoTaq Green Master Mix (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Thermocycling conditions were as follows: 94 °C for 3 minutes; 40 cycles of 94 °C for 30 seconds, 55 °C for for 30 seconds, and 72 °C for 30 seconds; and a final step at 72 °C for 10 minutes.

Samples were then tested for the presence of Wolbachia using primers against the Wolbachia wsp (forward primer 5´ AGT TGA TGG TAT TAC CTA TAA G 3´ and reverse primer 5´ TGA CTT CCG GAG TTA CAT CAT AAC 3´, product size 410 bp) and GroEL (forward primer 5´ TTT GAT CGC GGT TAT C 3´ and reverse primer 5´ AGA TCT TCC ATC TTG ATT CC 3´, product size 410 bp) genes to determine the presence or absence of Wolbachia spp. Nuclease free water was used as negative control and female tsetse fly DNA (Glossina morsitans morsitans) from the lab line maintained at Yale University insectarium was used as a positive control. PCR was performed with initial denaturation at 94 °C for 3 minutes, followed by 38 cycles consisting of at 94  °C for 30 seconds, at 50 °C for 30 seconds, and at 72 °C for 30 seconds; and a final extension for 10 minutes at 72 °C.

DNA samples were also analyzed for the presence of Spiroplasma utilizing primers against the long subunit of 16S rRNA (forward primer 5´ GGG TGA GTA ACA CGT ATC T 3´ and reverse primer 5´ CCT TCC TCT AGC TTA CAC TA 3´, product size 1.000 bp). Nuclease free water was used as negative control and female tsetse fly DNA (Glossina fuscipes fuscipes) obtained from the field in Uganda was used as a positive control. PCR amplifications were performed with initial denaturation at 94 °C for 3 minutes, followed 38 cycles consisting of at 94 °C for 30 seconds, at 55 °C for 30 seconds, and at 72 °C for 1.30 seconds; and a final extension for 10 minutes at 72 °C.

PCR products were analyzed by agarose gel-electrophoresis on a 1% gel, stained with ethidium bromide and recorded using the Gel Doc EQ quantification analysis software (Bio-Rad, Image Lab™ Software Version 4.1).

The positive DNA fragments were excised from the agarose gel and extracted using the Monarch® DNA Gel Extraction Kit (New England Biolabs, Inc.). The amplified PCR products were ligated into pGEM-T Vector (Promega, Madison, WI) and recombinant plasmids were used transform competent Escherichia coli strain DH5a. Transformed cells were cultured and recombinant plasmid was extracted using the QIAprep® Spin Miniprep Kit (Qiagen, Valencia CA). The purified DNA was sequenced in at the Yale Keck DNA Sequencing Facility.

Ethics committee approval has not been obtained due to working on Musca flies. There are no human patients in the study.

Statistical Analysis

No statistical analysis was carried out in this study.

RESULTS

Musca beta-tubulin was found with standard PCR amplification in samples (Figure 1).

Figure 1

A total of 40 Musca species which consisted of 20 female and 20 male were screened for Wolbachia spp. According to the results, no positive Musca flies were found for wsp and GroEL spesific primers of Wolbachia spp. in this study.

In addition, analysis for the presence of Spiroplasma using 16S specific primers indicates that 5% (1/20) of female Musca spp. were positive for infection, while none of the male samples (0/20) were positive (Figure 2).

Figure 2

The amplified products were sequenced and analyzed by BLAST analysis against available sequence data in the NCBI GenBank NT Bacterial Database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST). The BLAST results indicate that Spiroplasma amplification products, the fragments were sequenced and subjected to BLAST analysis. The closest resulting match of the putative 16S rRNA fragments was to the 16S ribosomal RNA gene from Spiroplasma sp. Bratislava 1 16S ribosomal RNA gene, partial sequence (100% coverage, 99% identity GenBank accession number KP967685.1).

DISCUSSION

Several studies have been conducted to investigate endosymbiotic bacteria in various insect species by using molecular methods. Werren et al. (4) detected Wolbachia strains in over 16% of neotropical insects. West et al. (14) reported that 22% of Lepidoptera and Aphids were infected with Wolbachia. Jeyaprakash and Hoy (6) indicated that 76% of examined 63 arthropod species were positive for Wolbachia. Gotoh et al. (15) the first systematic survey of 42 spider mite species in Japan revealed that seven species (16.7%) were infected with Wolbachia. Aksoy and Rio (16) and Rio et al. (17) revealed that symbionts including Wolbachia can use as a novel tool for control of parasitic diseases. Kyei-Poku et al. (18) screened for Wolbachia in populations of arthropods of current interest to biocontrol programs in Canada and infections were detected in 46% of the 105 species tested. Floate et al. (19) prevalence of Wolbachia infection were detected in 15 of 21 (71%) species of wasps and three of nine (33%) species of flies. Pourali et al. (7) showed that 14.06% of arthropod colonies and 7.14% of nematode colonies were positive for Wolbachia in Iran. The presence of Wolbachia spp. was determined in sand flies by many researchers (20-24). Alam et al. (25) reveal that Wolbachia infections confer strong CI during embryogenesis in Wolbachia free females when mated with Wolbachia infected males.

There are few reports regarding bacterial endosymbiont in Musca species in the world. Mingchay et al. (8) were detected Wolbachia supergroups A or B in 14% (7/51) of filth flies (Diptera: Muscidae, Calliphoridae, and Sarcophagidae) using PCR specific for wsp. Bahrndorff et al. (26) Wolbachia spp. was found to be in less than 4% of the flies (Musca domestica). Pourali et al. (7) showed that 2 of 25 M. domestica colonies were positive for Wolbachia belonged to A supergroup in Iran. Martin et al. (27) were determined Wolbachia (wsp gene) on M. domestica.

Spiroplasma endosymbionts are maternally transmitted bacteria that often acts as a male-killer and causes female-biased sex ratios in insects (10,12,13). Previous work indicates that infections with the microbes Spiroplasma are common in the drosophilidae (3,10,12,13). However, there are endosymbiont Spiroplasma surveys in various insect species, such as bees, mosquitoes, butterflies and ladybirds (28-35). Martin et al. (27) were determined presence of Spiroplasma on M. domestica and they explained PCR products were of too poor quality to produce a DNA sequence that could be identified.

Literature review shows that currently there are not any data available on the presence of Wolbachia and Spiroplasma in Musca flies in Turkey. There are a few reports on the existence of Wolbachia in arthropods (36-41) and there is only one report about Spiroplasma in sandflies (40). Molecular studies in Turkey have reported that Wolbachia infection was detected in Trissolcus species (36), in Culex pipiens (37,38) in sandflies (39,40), and in fleas (41). On the other hand, Saki and Şimşek (42) concluded that Wolbachia spp. were not present in some Diptera populations. Therefore, the present study was carried out in order to investigate the presence or absence of these bacteria among Musca spp. In the study, Wolbachia were not detected in Musca flies. The results of the study resemble results of research conducted by Saki and Şimşek (42).The present study is the first report of Spiroplasma endosymbionts in Musca species in Turkey and PCR products of amplified with Spiroplasma were sequenced and the closest resulting match of the putative 16S rRNA fragments was to the 16S ribosomal RNA gene from Spiroplasma sp. Bratislava 1 16S ribosomal RNA gene, partial sequence (100% coverage, 99% identity GenBank Accession Number KP967685.1).

CONCLUSION

Our study shows that Wolbachia spp. was no found in Musca flies. Of the 40 Musca samples, only 1 was detected as positive for Spiroplasma spp. Because endosymbiotic bacteria are an alternative strategy for controlling fly population, it seems that further studies should be carried out in order to detection the existence and importance of Wolbachia spp., Spiroplasma spp. and other endosymbionts in different regions of Turkey.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

This study was supported by TUBITAK (The Scientific and Technical Research Council of Turkey) (TUBITAK, BIDEB-2219). The authors are grateful to members of the Aksoy Lab for their contributions to the project especially Dr. Geoffrey M. Attardo for preparing tubulin primers and comments on the manuscript, Maria Gorreti Onyango, Michelle O’Neill and Yineng Yang for helping in Molecular Systematics Laboratory. This study was presented at the 20. National Congress of Parasitology (25-29 September 2017, Eskişehir, Turkey).

* Ethics

Ethics Committee Approval: Ethics committee approval has not been obtained due to working on Musca flies.

Informed Consent: There are no human patients in the study.

Peer-review: Internally peer-reviewed.

* Authorship Contributions

Concept: M.K., B.K., Design: M.K., S.A., B.K., Data Collection or Processing: M.K., B.K., Analysis or Interpretation: M.K., S.A., B.K., Literature Search: M.K., B.K., Writing: M.K., S.A., B.K.

Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest was declared by the authors.

Financial Disclosure: This study was supported by TUBITAK (The Scientific and Technical Research Council of Turkey) (TUBITAK, BIDEB-2219).

 

References

1
Jaenike J, Unckless R, Cockburn SN, Boelio LM, Perlman SJ. Adaptation via symbiosis: recent spread of a Drosophila defensive symbiont. Science 2010; 329: 212-5. 
2
Xie J, Vilchez I, Mateos M. Spiroplasma bacteria enhance survival of Drosophila hydei attacked by the parasitic wasp Leptopilina heterotoma. PLoS One 2010; 5: e12149. 
3
Herren JK, Lemaitre B. Spiroplasma and host immunity: activation of humoral immune responses increases endosymbiont load and susceptibility to certain Gram-negative bacterial pathogens in Drosophila melanogaster. Cell Microbiol 2011; 13: 1385-96.
4
Werren JH, Windsor D, Guo LR. Distribution of Wolbachia in neotropical arthropods. P R Soc London Ser B 1995; 262: 197-204.
5
Zhou W, Rousset F, O’Neil S. Phylogeny and PCR-based classification of Wolbachia strains using wsp gene sequences. Proc Biol Sci 1998; 265: 509-15. 
6
Jeyaprakash A, Hoy MA. Long PCR improves Wolbachia DNA amplification: wsp sequences found in 76% of sixty-three arthropod species. Insect Mol Biol 2000; 9: 393-405. 
7
Pourali P, Roayaei Ardakani M, Jolodar A, Razi Jalali MH. PCR screening of the Wolbachia in some arthropods and nematodes in Khuzestan province. Iran J Vet Res 2009; 10: 216-22.
8
Mingchay P, Sai-Ngam A, Phumee A, Bhakdeenuan P, Lorlertthum K, Thavara U, et al. Wolbachia supergroups A and B in natural populations of medically important filth flies (diptera: muscidae, calliphoridae, and sarcophagidae) in Thailand. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 2014; 45: 309-18. 
9
Duron O, Bouchon D, Boutin S, Bellamy L, Zhou L, Engelstädter J, et al. The diversity of reproductive parasites among arthropods: Wolbachia do not walk alone. BMC Biol 2008; 6: 27. 
10
Shokal U, Yadav S, Atri J, Accetta J, Kenney E, Banks K, et al. Effects of co-occurring Wolbachia and Spiroplasma endosymbionts on the Drosophila immune response against insect pathogenic and non-pathogenic bacteria. BMC Microbiol 2016; 16: 16. 
11
Regassa LB, Gasparich GE. Spiroplasmas: evolutionary relationships and biodiversity. Front Biosci 2006; 11: 2983-3002. 
12
Ventura IM, Martins AB, Lyra ML, Andrade CA, Carvalho KA, Klaczko LB. Spiroplasma in Drosophila melanogaster populations: prevalence, male-killing, molecular identification, and no association with Wolbachia. Microb Ecol 2012; 64: 794-801. 
13
Anbutsu H, Fukatsu T. Evasion, suppression and tolerance of Drosophila innate immunity by a male-killing Spiroplasma endosymbiont. Insect Mol Biol 2010; 19: 481-8. 
14
West SA, Cook JM, Werren JH, Godfray HC. Wolbachia in two insect host-parasitoid communities. Mol Ecol 1998; 7: 1457-65.
15
Gotoh T, Noda H, Hong XY. Wolbachia distribution and cytoplasmic incompatibility based on a survey of 42 spider mite species (Acari: Tetranychidae) in Japan. Heredity (Edinb) 2003; 91: 208-16. 
16
Aksoy S, Rio RV. Interactions among multiple genomes: tsetse, its symbionts and trypanosomes. Insect Biochem Mol Biol 2005; 35: 691-8. 
17
Rio RV, Wu YN, Filardo G, Aksoy S. Dynamics of multiple symbiont density regulation during host development: tsetse fly and its microbial flora. Proc Biol Sci 2006; 273: 805-14. 
18
Floate KD, Kyei-Poku GK, Coghlin PC. Overview and relevance of Wolbachia bacteria in biocontrol research. Biocontrol Sci Techn. 2006; 16: 767-88.
19
Kyei-Poku GK, Giladi M, Coghlin P, Mokady O, Zchori-Fein E, et al. Wolbachia in wasps parasitic on filth flies with emphasis on Spalangia cameroni. Entomol Exp Appl 2006; 121: 123-35.
20
Benlarbi M, Ready PD. Host-specific Wolbachia strains in widespread populations of Phlebotomus perniciosus and P. papatasi (Diptera: Psychodidae), and prospects for driving genes into these vectors of Leishmania. Bull Entomol Res 2003; 93: 383-91.
21
Parvizi P, Benlarbi M, Ready PD. Mitochondrial and Wolbachia markers for the sandfly Phlebotomus papatasi: little population differentiation between peridomestic sites and gerbil burrows in Isfahan province, Iran. Med Vet Entomol 2003; 17: 351-62.
22
Parvizi P, Fardid F, Soleimani S. Detection of a New Strain of Wolbachia pipientis in Phlebotomus perfiliewi transcaucasicus, a Potential Vector of Visceral Leishmaniasis in North West of Iran, by Targeting the Major Surface Protein Gene. J Arthropod Borne Dis 2013; 7: 46-55. 
23
Azpurua J, De La Cruz D, Valderama A, Windsor D. Lutzomyia sand fly diversity and rates of infection by Wolbachia and an exotic Leishmania species on Barro Colorado Island, Panama. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2010; 4: e627. 
24
Matsumoto K, Izri A, Dumon H, Raoult D, Parola P. First detection of Wolbachia spp., including a new genotype, in sand flies collected in Marseille, France. J Med Entomol 2008; 45: 466-9.
25
Alam U, Medlock J, Brelsfoard C, Pais R, Lohs C, Balmand S, et al. Wolbachia symbiont infections induce strong cytoplasmic incompatibility in the tsetse fly Glossina morsitans. PLoS Pathog 2011; 7: e1002415.
26
Bahrndorff S, de Jonge N, Skovgård H, Nielsen JL. Bacterial Communities Associated with Houseflies (Musca domestica L.) Sampled within and between Farms. PLoS One 2017; 12: e0169753. 
27
Martin OY, Gubler A, Wimmer C, Germann C, Bernasconi MV. Infections with Wolbachia and Spiroplasma in the Scathophagidae and other Muscoidea. Infect Genet Evol 2012; 12: 315-23. 
28
Jiggins FM, Hurst GD, Jiggins CD, vd Schulenburg JH, Majerus ME. The butterfly Danaus chrysippus is infected by a male-killing Spiroplasma bacterium. Parasitology 2000; 120: 439-46. 
29
Sokolova MI, Zinkevich NS, Zakharov IA. Bacteria in ovarioles of females from maleless families of ladybird beetles Adalia bipunctata L. (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) naturally infected with Rickettsia, Wolbachia, and Spiroplasma. J Invertebr Pathol 2002; 79: 72-9. 
30
Tinsley MC, Majerus ME. A new male-killing parasitism: Spiroplasma bacteria infect the ladybird beetle Anisosticta novemdecimpunctata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Parasitology 2006; 132: 757-65. 
31
Bastian FO, Elzer PH, Wu X. Spiroplasma spp. biofilm formation is instrumental for their role in the pathogenesis of plant, insect and animal diseases. Exp Mol Pathol 2012; 93: 116-28. 
32
Meeus I, Vercruysse V, Smagghe G. Molecular detection of Spiroplasma apis and Spiroplasma melliferum in bees. J Invertebr Pathol 2012; 109: 172-4. 
33
Zheng HQ, Chen YP. Detection of Spiroplasma melliferum in honey bee colonies in the US. J Invertebr Pathol 2014; 119: 47-9. 
34
Galal FH, AbuElnasr A, Abdallah I, Zaki O, Seufi A. Culex (Culex) pipiens Mosquitoes Carry and Harbor Pathogenic Fungi during Their Developmental Stages. Erciyes Med J 2017; 39: 1-6.
35
Smith DA, Gordon IJ, Traut W, Herren J, Collins S, Martins DJ, et al. A neo-W chromosome in a tropical butterfly links colour pattern, male-killing, and speciation. Proc Biol Sci 2016; 283: 8-21.
36
Guz N, Kocak E, Akpınar AE, Gurkan MO, Kılıncer AN. Wolbachia infection in Trissolcus species (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae).Eur J Entomol. 2012; 109: 169-174.
37
Yıldırım A, Inci A, Duzlu O, Onder Z, Ciloglu A. Detection and molecular characterization of the Wolbachia Endobacteria in the Culex pipiens (Diptera: Culicidae) specimens collected from Kayseri province of Turkey. Ankara Üniv Vet Fak Der 2013; 60: 189-94.
38
Yetişmiş G, Düzlü Ö, Yıldırım A, Çiloğlu A Önder Z, İnci A. Molecular investigation and genotyping of Wolbachia endobacteria in mosquito species in Sultan Marshes region. Ankara Üniv Vet Fak Derg 2018; 65: 229-37.
39
Karakuş M, Karabey B, Orçun Kalkan Ş, Özdemir G, Oğuz G, Erişöz Kasap Ö, et al. Midgut Bacterial Diversity of Wild Populations of Phlebotomus (P.) papatasi, the Vector of Zoonotic Cutaneous Leishmaniasis (ZCL) in Turkey. Sci Rep 2017; 7: 14812. 
40
Karatepe B, Aksoy S, Karatepe M. Investigation of Wolbachia spp. and Spiroplasma spp. in Phlebotomus species by molecular methods. Sci Rep 2018; 8: 10616. 
41
Onder Z, Ciloglu A, Duzlu O, Yildirim A, Okur M, Yetismis G, et al. Molecular detection and identification of Wolbachia endosymbiont in fleas (Insecta: Siphonaptera). Folia Microbiol (Praha) 2019; 64: 789-96. 
42
Saki CE, Şimşek S. Investigation of Wolbachia spp in Some Flies Species (Order: Diptera) by PCR. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg 2014; 20: 417-9.
2024 ©️ Galenos Publishing House