Cutaneous Leishmaniasis in Dr. Ersin Arslan Training and Research Hospital After Migration and During the Pandemic (2019-2022)
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
Original Investigation
P: 160-163
September 2024

Cutaneous Leishmaniasis in Dr. Ersin Arslan Training and Research Hospital After Migration and During the Pandemic (2019-2022)

Turkiye Parazitol Derg 2024;48(3):160-163
1. Gaziantep City Hospital Microbiology/Parasitology Laboratory, Gaziantep, Türkiye
No information available.
No information available
Received Date: 19.12.2023
Accepted Date: 24.09.2024
Online Date: 07.10.2024
Publish Date: 07.10.2024
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

ABSTRACT

Objective

Cutaneous leishmaniasis is a parasitic skin disease transmitted by the bite of sandflies. In our region, which is endemic for this disease, there has been a great migration from a much more endemic region and population movements from our area to Türkiye and abroad. Afterward, a pandemic was experienced. Due to these two extraordinary events and the possible epidemic potential in our region, it is useful to follow-up on the disease. We aimed to contribute to the evaluation of the disease in these processes by analyzing the data of our laboratory in recent years.

Methods

Between January 2019 and December 2022, samples from patients who came to our laboratory with suspected cutaneous leishmaniasis were taken, stained and examined under a microscope. Patients were evaluated in terms of age, gender, nationality, place of residence, lesion site and duration.

Results

Out of the 144 examined cases, 64 (44.4%) were positive for cutaneous leishmaniasis. Among these positive cases, 40 (62.5%) were women, 24 (37.5%) were men, and 54 (84.3%) belonged to the 0-9 age group. Of those who tested positive, 54 (84.3%) were Turkish citizens and 23 (35.9%) were Syrian citizens. Fifty-four (84.3%) patients had only single lesion. While the number of applications and positivity rates remained within normal levels in 2019 and 2020, a significant decrease was observed in both from 2021 and 2022.

Conclusion

Cutaneous leishmaniasis is carried by migration, decreases in large-scale isolations such as pandemics, and its spread can be prevented with correct diagnosis and treatment. Although the number of patients may change over time and place, cutaneous leishmaniasis is a disease that threatens the health of societies and should always be monitored.

Keywords:
Cutaneous leishmaniasis
migration
pandemic
Türkiye
Syria

INTRODUCTION

Cutaneous leishmaniasis is a parasitic disease with zoonotic and anthroponotic characteristics. The vector transmits the parasite when biting reservoirs or humans. The lesions are mostly seen on open areas such as the face and extremities where the fly can easily reach. Lesions lasting longer eventually heal by leaving a scar and scar tissue. This scar may cause aesthetics problems in visible areas, especially on the face. Cutaneous leishmaniasis is a common and neglected disease. It has been reported in 98 countries in the world. Low socio-economic level, poor housing and nutrition, population mobility, changes in the environment and climate, and poor health services are the most important risk factors (1-4).

Cutaneous leishmaniasis has been reported in Türkiye since the beginning of the 19th century. It has been known by our people for hundreds of years; it is given different names according to the regions in our country such as oriental boil, Antep boil, Aleppo boil, year boil, beauty sore (5).

Çukurova and Southeastern Anatolia, including Gaziantep, are considered as endemic regions. While the cases were stable in these regions, the Syrian civil war in our nearby geography and migration to our country, followed by population mobility within our country, led to an increase in numbers and prevalence Gaziantep was preferred by migrants due to its proximity to Syrian cities and being an industrial city (5, 6). Some of the migrants settled here, some of them stayed here for a while and dispersed to other cities in Türkiye or went to European countries (7).

In our study, we aimed to evaluate the cutaneous leishmaniasis cases admitted to our hospital and the epidemiologic characteristics of these cases during the migration and pandemic process.

METHODS

Between January 2019 and December 2022, patients who applied to the dermatology clinic of our hospital with the complaint of non-healing wounds and were thought to have cutaneous leishmaniasis were referred to our laboratory. At least two samples were taken from all lesions in the patient in accordance with the technique (incision-scraping, aspiration, aspiration following saline injection), fixed with methanol and stained with giemsa stain. After staining, the entire preparation was examined with a x100 objective by the relevant specialist physician. Samples were taken again from very suspicious patients in whom parasites could not be detected and the same procedures were repeated. Samples with amastigotes were considered positive (Figure 1). Patients were recorded in terms of age, sex, nationality, place of residence, site, type and duration of lesion. Patients or their relatives were asked “whether their wounds were associated with a disease they suspected” to understand awareness about the disease.

Statistical Analysis

“Jamovi 2.3.28 Solid” programme was used for statistical analysis. Chi-square test was applied when comparing the data and p<0.05 was considered significant.

Ethical approval was obtained from the Clinic Research Ethics Committee of the Gaziantep University (no: 2023/22, date: 12.04.2023).

RESULTS

The total number of patients analysed was 144 and Leishmania amastigotes were found in 64 (44.4%) of them. The results of the positive patients were as follows: Twenty-four (37.5%) were male and 40 (62.5%) were female. The age group in which leishmaniasis is most common is 0-9 years old. Fifty-four (84,3%) had a single lesion and 10 (15.6%) had more than one lesion. Positive patients had 39 (48.1%) lesions on the head and neck, 22 (27.1%) on the upper extremities, 14 (17.2%) on the lower extremities and 6 (7.4%) on the trunk. Of the lesions, 50 (61.7%) were papules, 22 (27.1%) nodules, 4 (4.9%) plaques, and 5 (6.1%) other types. Six (9.3%) patients had ulcers and 13 (20%) had crusts (Figure 2). The average time between the onset of lesions and diagnosis was 2.8 months. Forty (62.5%) of the patients were Turkish citizens and 24 (37.5%) were Syrian citizens. Twenty-three (35.9%) were from the centre of Gaziantep and 41 (64.0%) were from the villages. Syrian citizens have no history of travelling to Syria in recent years. In the 4-year period, the highest number of patient applications and positivity was in 2019 and 2020. There was very little positivity in 2022 and none in 2021 (Table 1). Statistically, there was no statistically significant difference between women and men, between 0-9 age group and other age groups, between Turkish citizens and Syrian citizens in terms of positivity rate. Of the 144 applicants we asked about their wounds, 113 (78.4 %) referred to the disease by its local name.

DISCUSSION

The leishmaniasis positivity rate of 44.4% in our study was found to be 46% and 50% in previous studies conducted in our city (8, 9). Diagnosis rates of stained preparations vary between 30% and 96%. Reasons for this variation include the experience of the examiner, the location and method of lesion acquisition (10). Our study is limited in this respect and additional methods such as culture and polymerase chain reaction should be used for more efficient results.

The number of females and males with Leishmania was 40 (62.5) and 24 (37.5), respectively. In previous studies in our province, the rate of female patients was found to be 47.1% by Cömert et al. (11) and Eroglu and Özgöztaşi (6) 53.5% was found. The fact that women are more concerned about physical appearance than men may have increased the number of applicants.

In line with many studies, the highest number of applications and positivity was observed in the 0-9 age group in our study (11, 12). As in many infectious diseases, the incidence of leishmaniasis is higher in the pediatric age group. The immune system in children is not fully developed, they cannot protect themselves against the vector, and they spend more time outside during the play-school age (3, 5).

The presence of a single lesion in most of the cases and the majority of the lesions on the face are expected results in leishmaniasis. Midges bite exposed areas especially when people are sleeping. Since the face is the most exposed area in all seasons, lesions are mostly seen on the face. The fact that the lesions generally have a papule appearance, papule is an early stage finding and in our opinion, it is related to the awareness of the disease and early presentation. (3, 5).

The mean duration of onset of lesions was 2.8 months according to the patients’ testimony. This is consistent with the incubation period of the disease. The time of the first appearance of the lesion is based on the patient’s statement and generally vague dates are given. Naturally, the duration of lesions is also subjective. However, the fact that the disease is recognized by most of the cases (78.4%) is positive and may help early presentation and early treatment.

The number of Turkish citizens who were positive was 40 (62.5%) and the number of Syrian citizens was 24 (37.5%). The high number and proportion of Turkish citizens is not something we expect. In many previous studies, it is seen that the number of patients with Syrian citizenship is higher than the number of local cases (5, 6, 8, 9, 11-14). The fact that Syrian patients are treated in our city (6) may have reduced the rate of anthroponotic transmission and the number of patients. None of the patients had a history of travelling to Syria or abroad in recent years. This indicates that the source of transmission and infection is entirely in Türkiye. Most patients (64%) live in rural areas. This is usual for cutaneous leishmaniasis (5).

The data we evaluated in our study varied over the years. From January 2019 until April 10, 2020, when there was a lockdown due to the pandemic, the number of patients was consistent with previous years. After this date, although outpatient services were provided from time to time, the number of applications and cases decreased significantly. In March 2022, the health system started to work completely, and although there were applications, there was no noticeable increase in cutaneous leishmaniasis cases. This may be due to the fact that all travel between villages, cities and countries has stopped, and people cannot even go outside. Although the pandemic is an unpleasant situation, it is a fact that our cutaneous leishmaniasis cases decreased during and after this period.

CONCLUSION

Migration is expected to increase in the world due to wars, climate crisis, economic and social problems. Cutaneous leishmaniasis, which is one of these diseases, is carried by migration, decreases in large-scale isolations such as pandemics, and its spread can be prevented with correct diagnosis and treatment. Although the number of patients may change over time and place, cutaneous leishmaniasis is a disease that threatens the health of societies and should always be monitored.

*Ethics

Ethics Committee Approval: Ethical approval was obtained from the Clinic Research Ethics Committee of the Gaziantep University (no: 2023/22, date: 12.04.2023).

Informed Consent: Retrospective study.

Financial Disclosure: The author declared that this study received no financial support.

References

1
Despommier DD, Griffin DO, Gwadz RW, Hotez PJ, Knirsch CA. Clinical Appendix for Parasitic Diseases. Parasites Without Borders, Inc. NY [Internet] 7th ed. 2019. (cited 2023 December 19). Available from:www.parasiteswithoutborders.com p. 21-56.
2
Gunn A, Pitt SJ. Parasitology An Integrated Approach. 1th ed. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons, 2012. p. 63-70.
3
Özbel Y, Özensoy Töz S. Leishmaniasis. Özcel MA, Özbel Y, Ak M, editors. Özcel’in Tıbbi Parazit Hastalıkları Kitabı. Türkiye Parazitoloji Derneği Yayını, no: 22; 2007. s. 197-244.
4
World Health Organization. Leishmaniasis. 2023. (cited 2023 December 19). Available from:https://www.who.int/news-room/fact- sheets/detail/leishmaniasis
5
Topluoğlu S, Kitapçıoğlu G, Özbel Y. Şark Çıbanı. İzmir: 2019.
6
Eroglu F, Özgöztaşi O. The increase in neglected cutaneous leishmaniasis in Gaziantep province of Turkey after mass human migration. Acta Trop. 2019; 192: 138-43.
7
Şimşek D. Suriyeli mültecilerin Avrupa’ya yayılımı: analitik ve karşılaştırmalı bir değerlendirme. Adam Akademi. 2019; 9: 493-518.
8
Özkeklikçi A, Karakuş M, Özbel Y, Töz S. The new situation of cutaneous leishmaniasis after Syrian civil war in Gaziantep city, Southeastern region of Turkey. Acta Trop. 2017; 166: 358.
9
Özkeklikçi A. Kutanöz Leishmaniasis tanısı için Dr. Ersin Arslan Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Mikrobiyoloji Laboratuvarı’na 2016-2018 Yılları Arasında Başvuran Hastaların ve Gaziantep’te Hastalığın Durumunun Değerlendirilmesi. 21. Parazitoloji Kongresi. 28 Eylül-3 Ekim 2019, Çeşme/İzmir. Özet ve Tam Metin Kitabı. 2019. s. 251.
10
An İ, Harman M, Çavuş İ, Özbilgin A. The diagnostic value of lesional skin smears performed by experienced specialist in cutaneous leishmaniasis and routine microbiology laboratory. Turk J Dermatol. 2019; 13: 1-5.
11
Cömert AM, Deniz S, Togay A, Güneş F. Mersin ilinde 2010-2015 yılları arasında tanı konulan kutanöz leishmaniasis olgularının epidemiyolojik olarak değerlendirilmesi. Türk Hijyen ve Deneysel Biyoloji Dergisi. 2020; 139.
12
Yıldız İ, Malatyalı E. The Retrospective Analysis of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis Cases in Aydin Adnan Menderes University Research and Training Hospital Parasitology Laboratory. KSU Medical Journal. 2022; 17: 199-204.
13
Korkmaz S, Özgöztaşı O, Kayıran N. The Assesment of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis Patients Admiting to Gaziantep University of Medicine Faculty Leishmaniasis Diagnosis and Treatment Center. Turkiye Parazitol Derg. 2015; 39: 13-6.
14
Yazısız H, Çekin Y, Aydın TG, Koçlar FG, Gür N. Retrospective Evaluation of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis Results: Data from a Tertiary Hospital in Antalya. Akdeniz Medical Journal. 2020; 6: 506-10.